It’s all kicking off in Bristol

[deuse]

That they're trying to introduce additional laws that could see people harshly punished for simply using their right to peacefully protest.

I don't call it a peaceful protest when they are causing damage.
The people who organized it should pay for it.

 

[Raikiri]

I don't call it a peaceful protest when they are causing damage.
The people who organized it should pay for it.

I'm not talking about what happened in Bristol. I never said that was a peaceful protest.

What was that about talking for other people?

 

[deuse]

I'm not talking about what happened in Bristol. I never said that was a peaceful protest.

What was that about talking for other people?

Please be more specific.

Thank you and have fun and stay safe.

 

[LeMson]

Literally last year when the Government had to do yet another U-turn on students grades being decided by an algorithm?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ent-hyde-park-grades-university-a9671916.html

Cool I had missed that one during a google

 

[Raikiri]

Please be more specific.

Thank you and have fun and stay safe.

Bouton Aide asked what the problem was if laws were already in place to punish those who didn't peacefully protest. I pointed out the issue.

It was quite specific.

 

[ebilcake]

So that's a "no", then.

If you're in denial at this point I don't really know what to say to you.

 

[Deleted User 298457]

If you're in denial at this point I don't really know what to say to you.

What am I looking at here?

 

[Deleted member 77746]

Has anyone got a copy of the new proposed law?

 

[LeMson]

What am I looking at here?

2 tier policing bro, keep up

 

[deuse]

Bouton Aide asked what the problem was if laws were already in place to punish those who didn't peacefully protest. I pointed out the issue.

It was quite specific.

I see.

The laws maybe in place but the police never follow them.
That's unless your a statue toppling destroying blm person.

The police even help...they run away.

 

[deuse]

If you're in denial at this point I don't really know what to say to you.

Yep

 

[StriderX]

I see.

The laws maybe in place but the police never follow them.
That's unless your a statue toppling destroying blm person.

The police even help...they run away.

So if the police never follow them, what's the point of new laws that they won't follow?

 

[deuse]

So if the police never follow them, what's the point of new laws that they won't follow?

They didn't follow them for the blm riots.

 

[deuse]

What am I looking at here?

Not sure if serious

 

[Psycho Sonny]

So if the police never follow them, what's the point of new laws that they won't follow?

Gives them more power to be the law rather than follow the law

 

[Kenai]

Has anyone got a copy of the new proposed law?

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0268/200268.pdf

All 307 pages of it, nice bit of bedtime reading

 

[Deleted User 234324]

I hope they can identify those involved, and I hope they throw the book at them.

If anything their actions have just solidified the bill.

 

[Deleted User 298457]

They didn't follow them for the blm riots.

Not sure if serious

Oh I see. It is a case of white fragility. Got it.

 

[VincentHanna]

If you're in denial at this point I don't really know what to say to you.

Two photos with no context, showing nothing of note.

Well I'm convinced.

Are you a lawyer by any chance? Your evidence is so compelling.

 

[ebilcake]

Oh, the BBC messed up. They actually broadcast this, that's unlike them.

 

[StriderX]

Oh, the BBC messed up. They actually broadcast this, that's unlike them.

You mean during the time said protest was peaceful?