I guess ignoring my response and throwing mud at me in the hope something will stick is the best option you had. You certainly had no chance of rebutting anything I wrote. Including when I quoted your own post stating something you claimed you hadn't stated.
I'd already addressed most of what you wrote previously, no point in going in circles.
The problem is when someone starts crying racism I switch off, especially when it has a white nationalist tinge to it. Ethnic nationalists associate nation with race so strongly that they perceive criticism of their nation to be an attack on their racial identity, the problem with this line of thinking is:
1. The British Empire was ethnically diverse.
2. White people lived outside the British Empire.
3. The actions of a nation (i.e. the interests of the elite) don't represent the average citizen.
4. The British Empire does not represent modern Britain. (which is why your suggestion that I am trying to denigrate the UK is absurd)
Which therefore makes the idea that criticising the British Empire (which for all intents and purposes hasn't existed for a long time) is someone racist or an attack on whiteness utterly ridiculous.
Your position is wildly inconsistent. On the one hand, you detest the queen and blame her for everything bad that has happened in the last 70 years. On the other hand, you want her to rule the UK by decree with parliament turned into at best a council of advisors.
Incidentally, that would be far more power than any monarch of the UK has ever had in practice because back in the days when the monarch had more use of their power government was required to be far more local due to the level of technology and the fact that the upper nobility had more money and more soldiers under their personal command than the monarch did. The direct rule of the monarch only extended 12 miles in diameter (as long as the upper nobility were willing to accept it).
If there is to be a monarch, then their duty should be primarily to protect the liberty of the citizens, giving their stamp of approval to oppressive legislation doesn't fit in with that. I don't think there should be a monarch, but the fact is there is one and they haven't done their utmost to safeguard citizens from the excesses of government. That's not an inconsistent position.
Saying I've blamed Elizabeth for everything bad that's happened is just royalist hyperbole.