Info pleaseYep.
Info pleaseYep.
Details?11 in favor 1 against 3 abstain from the UN vote.
China was one of those to abstain.
They didn’t actually, they were having a laugh at the post from James Bond. You just took offence to it which says a lot.
Verified by MI6.
I was responding to a point about the UK, not NATO.If by we you mean NATO then we easily have enough in the area alone.
11 in favor 1 against 3 abstain from the UN vote.
China was one of those to abstain.
Who were the other two? India and UAE?
Yep, as a permenant member of the security council along with UK, USA, China and France all hold vetos.So Russia can Veto the resolution and that's it?
Who were the other two? India and UAE?
Always has been a waste of time.UN is broken, a permanent member can invade and then veto any response.
Not the first time someone's alluded to saying I'm sending 'Random tweets' / misinformation etc, which is completely false.
So maybe I was a bit too quick to jump to conclusions, this definitely sounds like someone's mentioning me, don't you think?
I also came back to the thread after 1-2 hours and I didn't have time to read everything single post in detail, I skim read most of it.
Things are going pretty quick in here, lol
Europe contains two nuclear armed countries and most major nations are nato members there will be no European war. Machine guns on armoured vehicles are unnecessary when MAD means no conventional war will start.Sorry to say it's factual, not nonsense, Europe have been too busy being politically correct, instead of financing their own defence, to the current advantage of those that laugh at such liberal tripe.
Why do you claim this is nonsense?
Info please
Have you read his work?