Not sure we should be gloating considering our own questionable procurement schedule.
Likewise with Ajax, etc.

Not sure we should be gloating considering our own questionable procurement schedule.
Dunno what you're talking about, we have twice as many as they do, and recently we've even acquired planes to actually put on them! xDNot sure we should be gloating considering our own questionable procurement schedule.
Apparently NATO will be moving 5 carrier groups within range including north, med and to the east? not sure on the where of that last one.
^^ This and throwing 40k extra troops in to defend the eastern flank probably has me the most worried, yes you need to show force but NATO clearly think something tangible is likely to happen.
I mean 5 carrier groups, that's one hell of a show of force.
^^ This and throwing 40k extra troops in to defend the eastern flank probably has me the most worried, yes you need to show force but NATO clearly think something tangible is likely to happen.
I mean 5 carrier groups, that's one hell of a show of force.
Isn't this just for their annual war game exercise?
the total amount of anti tank weapons donated so far must be over 10k easy.
we sent 4,000 + USA 4,600
Ukraine claims to have destroyed around 1,300 vehicles.
so they are killing 1 vehicle for every 10 tries?
NYtimes claims
and they still need more including 6000 from the UK
I've seen at least one video where they shot one at an abandoned tank though, I guess it's easy to waste things when you get them for free
isn't responding in kind when you do the same thing back?
yea and fuel, the incinerator vans as well did Ukraine capture one yet?
I've kind of been reluctant to say it - but the way the US is acting reminds me of the lead up where it just felt like the US was reacting ahead of the threat we could see like they knew with certainty where the next few days were going... and they are acting like that now - i.e. the Stryker battle group sent to the border with Belarus, appear to be moving tanks from storage in Norway closer to the region, not just making them ready in case, etc. which if as seems likely the earlier urgency was due to having intel coming from fairly high up in the Russian government is concerning.
Seeing a lot of bombing and shelling videos tonight
I've kind of been reluctant to say it - but the way the US is acting reminds me of the lead up where it just felt like the US was reacting ahead of the threat we could see like they knew with certainty where the next few days were going... and they are acting like that now - i.e. the Stryker battle group sent to the border with Belarus, appear to be moving tanks from storage in Norway closer to the region, not just making them ready in case, etc. which if as seems likely the earlier urgency was due to having intel coming from fairly high up in the Russian government is concerning.
While not wanting to inflame the situation NATO have a job to do, getting the ducks in line is an inevitable part of that job. The west isn't choosing war here, but to not be prepared would be a huge mistake.
I'm an advocate for being prepared - but the way the US is acting has again that uncanny feeling they are doing so based on specific intel.
I'm hoping for a defenestration event..
There is a longer, fuller frame, video of it which is being attributed to a Ukrainian MLRS attack on Kherson airport - can see some rockets being intercepted and others appearing to explode in the air possibly prematurely.
*U.S. Assesses Up to 60% Failure Rate for Some Russian Missiles, Officials Say - RTRS
https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...me-russian-missiles-officials-say-2022-03-24/