Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
NLAW's are effective they've essentially achieved cult status in Ukraine the trouble is they're running out of them but so is the UK govt they're stating they don't have many left such is the rate they're getting through them so ukraine may have to fall back on other things like javelins which weigh twice as much and aren't nearly as good

Eh? Javlins are better but pricier.
 
Just seen that due to how badly Russia's invasion of Ukraine has gone Japan are now claiming sovereignty of some of the islands between themselves and Russia, guess everyone's lining up to poke the paper bear now word is out their military are a joke xD (Islands in question were Japanese until 1945 but occupied by Russia during WW2 and ceded to Russia as part of their surrender).

If its Sakhalin I did a photo shoot for Inmarsat there maybe 18 years ago. There is a oil pipeline down to the south of the island as the sea ice never reaches that far south so tankers can use it all year round. We were there in March and it was still covered in snow. Lots of Russians drinking lots of vodka. They said the bodies of people who'd got so drunk they got lost or fell asleep on their way home and got buried by the snow would soon start appearing as the snow melted. The Japanese definitely want it back.
 
Many nations in history did their share of very dirty deeds such as firebombing Cities full of women and kids. Not naming any names because people get very upset if you do
The difference was whole countries were at war with each other. An ‘innocent’ civilian may not have been a front line soldier but they may have been making the munitions for them, the food they ate or the shoes they wore or even the shoes that the munitions workers wore. It was a different time, a different era which cannot be judged through history. I’ll be blunt it’s the reason your typing in English.
 
Eh? Javlins are better but pricier.

Depends on situation - the NLAW has advantages (when used properly) in a lot of the fighting Ukraine has been doing - close to medium range, high mobility, medium contact engagements and pop up and run. While on the counterattack or for longer range non-direct-contact engagements they aren't a good substitute for the Javelin though.

NLAW's are effective they've essentially achieved cult status in Ukraine the trouble is they're running out of them but so is the UK govt they're stating they don't have many left such is the rate they're getting through them so ukraine may have to fall back on other things like javelins which weigh twice as much and aren't nearly as good

I think it is something we need to be wary of - if things spill out, whether a more limited/accidental event or a more serious wider war, we don't want to be caught with our pants down. IIRC we've sent nearly a quarter of our stock to Ukraine - which were already entering the point of being cycled out for new stock (probably one reason we've been so ready to supply them) but still.
 
Apparently Putin is saying that unfriendly states need to start buying gas supplies in the Russian Rubles, even current contracts.

Germany is insisting its still going to pay in Euro's.

If Russia turns off the gas supply would that be considered an attack on NATO countries?
 
Apparently Putin is saying that unfriendly states need to start buying gas supplies in the Russian Rubles, even current contracts.

Germany is insisting its still going to pay in Euro's.

If Russia turns off the gas supply would that be considered an attack on NATO countries?
Quite the turn of events since ww2 if so
 
Apparently Putin is saying that unfriendly states need to start buying gas supplies in the Russian Rubles, even current contracts.

Germany is insisting its still going to pay in Euro's.

If Russia turns off the gas supply would that be considered an attack on NATO countries?

They've been saying that for awhile.

Personally I think we need to more broadly share and deal with these issues if we want to stay on top of this situation - things like Germany's dependency on gas, even if it is a situation they've kind of put themselves in, should be dealt with via a unified approach from the West - there are also a lot of smaller entities who are going to feel disproportionate levels of pressure which should be supported.

Pentagon unsure if Russian convoy into Kyiv 'still exists'

Huh surely they would know from the drone footage?

The convoy dispersed largely - I assume what they mean is they don't know if those vehicles and supplies overall are still a thing - whether they are still supplying units spread out around Kyiv, how much had been destroyed and/or returned to Belarus/Russia, etc.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Putin is saying that unfriendly states need to start buying gas supplies in the Russian Rubles, even current contracts.

Germany is insisting its still going to pay in Euro's.

If Russia turns off the gas supply would that be considered an attack on NATO countries?

no a contractual disagreement. The original contract payment would have been in dollars but changing the pricing structure may have broken the contract. Not that putin cares.
 
Depends on situation - the NLAW has advantages (when used properly) in a lot of the fighting Ukraine has been doing - close to medium range, high mobility, medium contact engagements and pop up and run. While on the counterattack or for longer range non-direct-contact engagements they aren't a good substitute for the Javelin though.

No not just not a good substitute, not a substitute at all in that case as they don't have the same range, yes there are situations where the NLAW has some advantage, especially at very close range in an urban environment but overall the Javelin is a way more advanced anti-tank weapon.

In the British army for example you'll have, within an infantry battalion, a support weapons /maneuver support company containing recce, mortar, machine gun, assault pioneer and anti tank platoons.

The anti-tank platoon will have Javelins, they specialise in... well destroying tanks and armoured vehicles. Back in the day they'd have had MILAN, they're fun to watch go down the range at Otterburn, each missile is about the price of a Golf GTI.

Regular rifle platoons on the other hand will have NLAW when appropriate, back in the day it was LAW 80, unlike the anti-tank platoon guys it wasn't so common for people to get to fire these (though in the case of the LAW 80 there was an inbuilt 9mm spotting rifle that could be fired during live-fire demos - ironically I was involved in doing one of these in the 00s for some Ukrainian SF types!).
 
Even in war there ought to be boundaries that aren't crossed as it will always cast a shadow which if nothing else is strategically unwise. Perhaps the likes of Poland would have felt less need to be defensive after the USSR fell if such boundaries had been respected decades prior.

War often comes with a breakdown of civilisation - bringing out both the best and worst in people often without the normal binding of civilisation - especially more brutal regimes often just don't care as to those aspects in war especially as they generally work to the premise of being the victor and little concern for a longer term political picture.

Yeap, there's no such think as a "civilised" war with boundaries. Even countries who pride themselves as "the good guys" knowingly, as well as accidentally, kill civilians all the time.
 
Apparently Putin is saying that unfriendly states need to start buying gas supplies in the Russian Rubles, even current contracts.

Germany is insisting its still going to pay in Euro's.

If Russia turns off the gas supply would that be considered an attack on NATO countries?

lol how is turning off gas supply an attack, that's a business decision
 

Basically want F-15 and F-16

and Patriot missile defence or something as good as.


Ukraine currently operates long-range S-300 (SA-10) missile systems and medium-range BUK-M1 missile systems. However, these are outdated, Soviet-era systems that are no match for Russian systems

could also use more Soviet-era S-300 and BUK-M1 systems, which are also currently effective against the enemy

We think the S300 & Buk are rubbish and no match for Russia but they're also really effective & we'd like more :confused::confused::confused:

lol how is turning off gas supply an attack, that's a business decision

It's no different to the sanctions and embargo's put on Russia really
 
Ukraine takes an arm and wants the whole body, soon the war is over and they will be begging for cash on twitter, then shaming countries who don't give as much as they wanted
 
The anti-tank platoon will have Javelins, they specialise in... well destroying tanks and armoured vehicles. Back in the day they'd have had MILAN, they're fun to watch go down the range at Otterburn, each missile is about the price of a Golf GTI.

Years ago did a visit to one of the para bases in Aldershot - their multi-million pound MILAN missile simulator had got trashed by some school kids on a visit a couple of days before :s
 

Basically want F-15 and F-16

and Patriot missile defence or something as good as.

I mean to be fair they are fighting Russia on behalf of the rest of the West at this point, perhaps we should consider going beyond "defensive" aid?

Years ago did a visit to one of the para bases in Aldershot - their multi-million pound MILAN missile simulator had got trashed by some school kids on a visit a couple of days before :s

Yikes, oops. Sadly I've never used one, I have done exercises in an artillery simulator though which were fun - you basically sit in a kinda cinema room with a projection of a hillside/landscape and a pair of binoculars and then give fire orders and practice "bracketing"/adjusting the fire (kinda like using Newton's method in maths as a kid).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom