Soldato
Not likely it's 2020 with 10k miles on. And they talking to get this in by end of year at moment.By the time it happens, if it happens, your diesel will probably be in the scrapyard.
Not likely it's 2020 with 10k miles on. And they talking to get this in by end of year at moment.By the time it happens, if it happens, your diesel will probably be in the scrapyard.
You do 30k/annum so can't have owned it for long. If road pricing is imminent you must have known it was coming when you bought the car.Not likely it's 2020 with 10k miles on. And they talking to get this in by end of year at moment.
Anything on the mileage charge would be too much. It a stupid system.
A week ago. But I can't afford to purchase a car that wouldn't have this issue. It is a car available by limited ability to purchase something where I wouldn't be negatively affected.You do 30k/annum so can't have owned it for long. If road pricing is imminent you must have known it was coming when you bought the car.
Doesn't seem like a stupid system to me at all. You use your car twice as much as the average so it seems fair that you should pay twice as much as average.
Saying something is stupid because it directly and negatively affects you does not make it overall a stupid idea.
If that were the case, I think it's a terrific idea given I do 5000 miles a year so it would be much cheaper for me.
I'm not sure how they will do it. Currently people with ICE cars are, in a general sense, paying per mile given they use more fuel if they travel more (removing mpg differences).
The only way to charge an EV owner is either per mile or to add it to the charging. Is there a way to differentiate between charging an EV and boiling the kettle?
If the problem is EV just have them pay per mile and leave the fossil fuel cars as they are with current vehicle tax.
What has the charging of a kettle go to do with an EV. We are talking about distance travelled which is recorded on most EV's already and shared with the manufacture. Also this would be the same for all vehicles in terms of discussing but the talk by gov at moment is by number plate tracking which is mental in itself as it would costs tens of millions if not hundreds to get a full national system running to do that. None of it seems very viable but that what is being pushed for all road users at moment.How would this be managed?
Vehicle black box tracking (encouraging a black market for hacks to reduce reported mileage and people citing privacy concerns) or additional cost to electricity (can EV charging be differentiated from boiling a kettle or will everyone's bills increase if it cannot?)
How would this be managed?
Vehicle black box tracking (encouraging a black market for hacks to reduce reported mileage and people citing privacy concerns) or additional cost to electricity (can EV charging be differentiated from boiling a kettle or will everyone's bills increase if it cannot?)
Ok so I installed solar and battery storage which negates that idea completely. If anything it’s even more incentive to avoid the tax as it’s make solar even more cost effective for those that can afford the initial outlay. It also punishes those who down own their own roof further so I can see it as something that the current government might actually go with….I dont think its easy to detect whats using energy, the smart meter logic is to be able to tell them to turn on and off in future
I have said for some time, that with EVs coming we should have two rates (applies to multi rate tariffs) in effect for elec units over the minimum needed to live. So say 1500 units is base price, zero VAT. Above that is high price, with a eg 10p per unit government tax, and full VAT. (main reason in that charging at home shouldnt be a massive saving vs those who cannot)
The government could underwrite the system and even make the first 1500 free or heavily subsidised to all. Helps cost of living at the same time.
Can easily be tweaked so things such as heat pump heating could qualify you for another 1000 units per year etc.
some california studies that suggest subsidy of small scale domestic solar+batteries is less efficient than economy of scale commercial implementation - maybe boris has mates in the energy business.IMO solar should be compulsory for every new build and all social and council housing. I would also welcome a scheme to encourage all private owners to have solar but the age old question of funding will always be the problem as no-one wants to pay for it
Don't like it, use public transport or get a push a bike.
Spot the townie.Don't like it, use public transport or get a push a bike.
k well bore off with the other 15% of you.Spot the townie.
Neither of those options are realistic for rural areas.
People don't like the idea of GPS mileage tracking, sure new cars track you anyway plus phones but its different when the government wants to do it.
Apart from as people stated, when on holiday or similar. You pay for travelling with your car to the UK gov even when you are away. You then would need to share data to show you are not in the UK doing the mileage. Otherwise you are required for Google to provide the data of UK mileage but that will not tally with the MOT mileage as example.They wouldn't need to actually give any data to the government though. All they'd need to do is give a confirmation that the odometer mileage displayed on the car is verified by gps. Then the mileage can be read at MOT like usual.
Apart from as people stated, when on holiday or similar. You pay for travelling with your car to the UK gov even when you are away. You then would need to share data to show you are not in the UK doing the mileage. Otherwise you are required for Google to provide the data of UK mileage but that will not tally with the MOT mileage as example.