It's still the age old adage - If you can See it then you can Hit it and if you can Hit it then you can Kill it - but I agree that, with the "seeing" part of the kill chain being massively shortened, due to the use of drones to keep an all-seeing eye permanently over a relatively static battlespace, we've definitely entered an age where Sensor to Shooter to Effect has never been shorter and that effectiveness has become a large surprise to Russia, almost like they learned nothing in their years in Syria where this was a common tactic.
It'll be interesting to see in the very near future how more "technical" militaries (mostly Western) adapt in the future when a few $100 hobby drones can remove virtually all aspects of both strategic and tactical surprise. My guess is more EM-type weapons will be developed but I wonder whether "KISS" might be a better strategy rather than the usual response of demanding a more "technical" answer to a problem.
It'll be interesting to see in the very near future how more "technical" militaries (mostly Western) adapt in the future when a few $100 hobby drones can remove virtually all aspects of both strategic and tactical surprise. My guess is more EM-type weapons will be developed but I wonder whether "KISS" might be a better strategy rather than the usual response of demanding a more "technical" answer to a problem.