Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Russian have been launching cruise missiles at dams in the Kherson region, they appear to be trying to flood the region and raise the river levels to stop the Ukranian advance
 

This thread really explains a lot of why Putin is only doing a soft mobilisation and why the propaganda channels give mixed messages

Seems these people don't understand, when you have to put 1 of 25 on your tweet you're on the wrong platform. Twitter isn't for 25 chapter stories.

It's almost as bad as people upload text as images.
 
and recently Boris even travelled to Ukraine to scupper a peace deal.

Only it is really really easy to confirm that Putin was the one who scuppered the deal, made by a subordinate of his, not Boris, without having to rely on Western media for that information.

EDIT: Then we have all the times Russia stood up in the UN, etc. telling blatant lies making it impossible to trust them in a deal, regardless of any ill intentions by the West - another thing you can verify free of any potential bias or distortion from Western media.

Why is it this meme seems so apt...


Seems these people don't understand, when you have to put 1 of 25 on your tweet you're on the wrong platform. Twitter isn't for 25 chapter stories.

It's almost as bad as people upload text as images.

That is true but some of these people principally exist on Twitter and it may not be worth it for them to start a personal blog page or similar for the occasional airing of longer views.
 
A quick search on that author isn't giving me any indications she is an expert on politics or military matters. Here's her Amazon book list: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Books-Caitlin-Johnstone/s?rh=n:266239,p_27:Caitlin+Johnstone

These titles stand out:

* Woke: A Field Guide For Utopia Preppers
* The Complete Book Of Astrology: Your personal guide to learning, understanding and using Astrology


CaitOz - her twitter handle has previous history as being one of the least informed of all of the Russia stronk propagandists
qai0qHtmABLwU0M4K8aeMLVKa_huucVqf_76o7HcZHAdA4Rf-4AQfrUd1buEwXALNbfE_y1I27w3x4IO5Vojg4IH1tkGNkuGKHp-vximuSP6t1kWSpeAwb8wCbwAEXiwUfLBfBe0PysHam6nWPVI-GuvONTsK6_LZBQKEBU1z3LBhOU__qNHHhOJSNIunMGd6GDqeWKC_6MSqqieSXaG0RSaKxOg6FIuQVqXV4HUkPsfZIJSRV2N30cii0WU6oPa-s34qxHmiMLgzeQ-G0EyGfbIhEdaBRV4cacVDeVUBpJB3ZSeaygtO5WBAXlwrifdEnix-gIXry-oLXvz4erYLBZyTmNBkbnPZXrKk_cy00981lMcolucr50TxnGBjH5D-9gBKUUBQIw6CpXAJckrg6y7KMa08kv6NDKs3ESL14hNukOICtnk5lP4vpIDJH1tK_b5bSFQq91bM0LvR8ruBnklMeyUxRkT1S3GXE25t03i6sJNTJXU0SS6OveXM19IlrgxhpgGZkXafeh2k9M9KicfTH8KwlZSc1LWLK2qYuz4TzCjjk8uTfMajt4w34E8e1wfOyv5zQiJrFy91TfhPcZ0EtMdEGiQW1Py6dAHHK_K0Hw_jrmSeCSP4AxEOEez-blNIOc66bjstABk4WKO0rT8DAVOJ8hrmWfGdd64kxcVUoMfQveWt-jDo7o9MOCaLKLLUrqrcJL75YGXtV8TsLSwUAut4LxLAi2OEYCOKyND-MneCxEbJjO8zFw=w499-h364-no
in fact most of the western tankies are more in denial of Russia than the Russian state TV propagandist.
and the reality is that none of her tweets age very well. and if she was as open and journalistic, as is claimed above; why has she blocked everybody apart from confirmed tankies, vatniks, and Kremlin-approved trolls?
if you listen, or take notice of what she says about anything outside of astrology you are being wilfully naive about Russia, Putin, his cabal, and their imperialist intentions.

sorry if that sounds blunt, but get this into your head: she isn't either an accurate, or balanced source. she is as biased as it is possible to be
 
Also now that I think about it all the complaints about western assistance may not entirely be due to Russian supremacist nonsense, they may genuinely believe that since commanders have been offering such 'success' that the only reason that in reality they've begun losing ground must be due to the NATO-boogeymans.

One of the reason the likes of China probably wouldn't be as impressive in a war as the on paper numbers - like with Russia a lot of decisions run all the way up and down the chain of command with autonomous decision making at unit level discouraged, government/military leaders detached from the reality of what the lower level commanders are seeing, etc. and likewise the top level government often detached from the military leadership's reality, etc. etc.

The paranoia and desire to retain a tight grip on power at the top generally undoes the military effectiveness of regimes like this when fighting a peer foe fortunately (and if they attempted a more Western like command structure they'd quickly get replaced).
 
reading elsewhere; Melitopol is the next
If Putin is as bad as you say, then how come he saved Syria from being destroyed by the US/UK/NATO alliance? They were hell-bent on turning Syria into another Libya. It's the British and American governments who don't want peace and recently Boris even travelled to Ukraine to scupper a peace deal. Meanwhile, the US/UK and NATO are only too happy to keep the war going and don't give a damn about how many innocent civilians die in this Ukrainian conflict. It's all about weakening Russia militarily and economically and they couldn't care less about those poor Ukrainian civilians.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2...hy-did-the-west-stop-a-peace-deal-in-ukraine/
something i read earlier today seems to sum up your position >>it's easier for someone who knows nothing about Putin's Russia to idolise it. back in the olden days it was easy for western Stalinists as well<<

saying that; have you ever been to Russia as a resident, a long-term employee (not part of the 'Moscow set'), live in Russia now, have relatives who are permanent residents outside of Moscow?

i won't labour the point, but i think you can see where i'm going with this
 
One of the reason the likes of China probably wouldn't be as impressive in a war as the on paper numbers - like with Russia a lot of decisions run all the way up and down the chain of command with autonomous decision making at unit level discouraged, government/military leaders detached from the reality of what the lower level commanders are seeing, etc. and likewise the top level government often detached from the military leadership's reality, etc. etc.

The paranoia and desire to retain a tight grip on power at the top generally undoes the military effectiveness of regimes like this when fighting a peer foe fortunately (and if they attempted a more Western like command structure they'd quickly get replaced).
top-down leadership in common parlance.

and you absolutely on the button in that it is THE most inflexible method of operating ever devised. and strangely enough, it is THE Soviet/Russian tactic of the ages. and is easily broken.

NATO-aligned nations have a much more junior NCO-focused style
 

Not even gonna bother making a comment except to mute of course.
Strelkov (because he doesn't like the name 'Girkin' because of its western implications ;-) ) is definitely a good account to follow. purely because he is one of the few pro-Russians who aren't afraid to criticise Putin & his cabal.
i think Kadyrov *may* soon join that small, but exclusive club soon as well. Strelkov tries his hardest to be positive, but because he has a military background he understands exactly why Putin micromanaging the whole illegal invasion is folly

both are currently at the top of my defenestration chart as well ;-)
 

I can't tie it up 100% but looks like Putin was flying Sochi to Moscow when this event supposedly happened - looks like he is currently flying out of Moscow again (assumedly to Uzbekistan).

(Possible the timeline was fudged for security reasons and he was ahead of his supposed movements, etc. though).

On another note - oops:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom