• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Your current GPU buying strategy

I think you are absolutely right. The days of the GPU being a frequent upgrade are over if NVIDIA continue these prices. I was waiting to upgrade to a 4080, but it really looks like it is not going to happen. I have always bought one below the top tier, but they have out-priced me now. Spending £1200 for a 4080 is insanity imo. And certainly not something I am comfortable doing every few years. I do still need a more powerful card than the one I have. I am interested in the 7900xtx because by all accounts it's going to be cheaper than the 4080 and beat the pants off it. Honestly, though, this may be my last upgrade for a very long time.
This is a sane normal person outlook.

Any GPU I'm buying I won't be replacing for it's life, probably 8 years same as my PC cycle. I don't get the upgrade yearly craze to get 15% fps in a game, we must have a lot of esports champions on here.
 
My strategy until my last upgrade was always to buy when the latest generation had just released and then pickup a good deal on the previous generation's cards (upgrade history for the last 10 years Geforce 670, R9 290, Vega 56, all just after the new shiny had just been released).

The last few years knocked that idea well and truly on the head. But I luckily managed to get hold of FE 3060ti to go into a new build in January (although RRP still the most expensive card i've ever bought). Now looking to hopefully get a decent deal on a 6800/XT for less than <£500 around Black Friday...it's getting close....

Edit to add - not that there's anything wrong with the 3060ti, just i've more machines in the house that could do with an upgrade.
 
Last edited:
My outlook is if the card I have no longer satisfies in the stuff I do.

By satisfy I mean runs games at max generally. Then I see what options are available. up to 2070 Super I had not spent more than £500 on a GPU ever before, so the 3080 Ti FE was a marked shift, but I only said yes to it as I found a buyer for the 2070 at £460, so just added the difference which meant I wasn't that far away from the overall input into the new card anyway.

Unlikely this will remain the case for the next upgrade if the 50 series is what I go for as am skipping 40 series because I am using brain smarts.
 
Last edited:
This is a sane normal person outlook.

Any GPU I'm buying I won't be replacing for it's life, probably 8 years same as my PC cycle. I don't get the upgrade yearly craze to get 15% fps in a game, we must have a lot of esports champions on here.

Nah. I upgrade relatively often and it does not cost much. You just need to wait for opportunities to present itself. Like you telling me it is not a good deal spending £185 upgrading from a 3070 to a 3080 Ti? That is around 50% upgrade in both performance and vram.
 
Nah. I upgrade relatively often and it does not cost much. You just need to wait for opportunities to present itself. Like you telling me it is not a good deal spending £185 upgrading from a 3070 to a 3080 Ti? That is around 50% upgrade in both performance and vram.
Personally? No. I like my warranties :D
 
4090 = x2 3080's. 100% performance upgrade is unheard of.
So according to techpower up the 4090 is 77% faster than a 3080. a little short of your 2x estimate.
Also the performance increase is pretty normal. The 3090 is 85% faster than a 2080, or 57% faster than a 2080ti.

People have whipped themselves into a frenzy thinking this is an unprecedented level of performance increase when it is nothing too special
 
Last edited:
So according to techpower up the 4090 is 77% faster than a 3080. a little short of your 2x estimate.
Also the performance increase is pretty normal. The 3090 is 85% faster than a 2080, or 57% faster than a 2080ti.

People have whipped themselves into a frenzy thinking this is an unprecedented level of performance increase when it is nothing too special
The 3080 was 65% faster than a 2080 for less money, the 4080 only looks around 35-40% faster for near double the cost, for a 2 node jump this is absolutely shocking.
 
Personally? No. I like my warranties :D

I like my warranty also. I have over 2 years warranty on it, which is more than what I had on the 3070 I sold :)

The original owner is a reputable user on here so I am not worried. Besides, how often do graphics cards break? Not often in my experience.
 
[…] Besides, how often do graphics cards break? Not often in my experience.
Not often. I snapped 3 tiny little MLCs off the back of an A2000 when installing into a case it had no right to fit in. I sort of badly soldered 2 back, and the 3rd escaped to France and is now running a bistro in Lac.

The card runs perfectly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNA
So according to techpower up the 4090 is 77% faster than a 3080. a little short of your 2x estimate.
Also the performance increase is pretty normal. The 3090 is 85% faster than a 2080, or 57% faster than a 2080ti.

People have whipped themselves into a frenzy thinking this is an unprecedented level of performance increase when it is nothing too special

Looking at all the performance graphs with RT on and 4k. Looks like double to me on all but FC6 That's the resolution I use and I want RT on, why wouldn't you when they've also enhanced RT performance?

Where you get 77% from anyway? 1080 & 1440p resolutions are all CPU bound anyway so not allowing full performance of the 4090 and would skew the result down as the 4090 wont be fully utilized - so was that an overall game average across all resolutions? Post link. Even then 77% not too special!?

What card you got? 970? Bet you thought that had 4GB of RAM when you bought it. :cry:

Techpower up FE review 4k RT on

Control
3080 - 32fps
4090 - 68fps

CP2077
3080 - 17fps
4090 - 42fps

Deathloop
3080 - 48fps
4090- 121 fps

F1 2022
3080 - 36
4090 - 85

FC6
64
96

Metro exodus
53
116

Resident Evil
75
175

Watch DOgs Legion
37
75

I agree with the silly money part. You pays your money you makes your choice. 'tis only money - can't take it with you.
 
I like my warranty also. I have over 2 years warranty on it, which is more than what I had on the 3070 I sold :)

The original owner is a reputable user on here so I am not worried. Besides, how often do graphics cards break? Not often in my experience.
I've had 2 failures in my lifetime.

7800 GT and 4890 (had 2 in CF).

So I've always used the warranty. Imo I wouldn't even purchase these new cards bar Zotac for 5 year warranty, especially when the outlay is now 4 figures.

Everyone buys different I guess, but that is my take on it. I've also had a 1k PC monitor literally catch FIRE within a year (LG), so warranties are definitely useful!
 
Last edited:
Where you get 77% from anyway? 1080 & 1440p resolutions are all CPU bound anyway so not allowing full performance of the 4090 and would skew the result down as the 4090 wont be fully utilized - so was that an overall game average across all resolutions? Post link. Even then 77% not too special!?
Yep 77% is a pretty normal uplift. Nothing special.


3080-tech-power-up.jpg



What card you got? 970? Bet you thought that had 4GB of RAM when you bought it. :cry:
:confused:

What does that have to do with this discussion? Or was that just a pathetic attempt to have a dig at me for running an old card?
 
Last edited:
I've had 2 failures in my lifetime.

7800 GT and 4890 (had 2 in CF).

So I've always used the warranty. Imo I wouldn't even purchase these new cards bar Zotac for 5 year warranty, especially when the outlay is now 4 figures.

Everyone buys different I guess, but that is my take on it.

Indeed. In my case I will have sold the card before warranty is over so makes no difference to me. Only way I get screwed is if in the next year or two the card breaks and on top of that the original owner decides not to help. Both occurring at the same time are pretty slim imo, but obviously can happen which is a risk I am will to take. Especially for performance people were paying almost three times as much not so long ago :)
 
Back
Top Bottom