Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 22,396
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
Will we freeze this winter. Good analysis as ever
Me either but it is telling that one of the largest military powers in the world has been reduced to buying second rate kit from a second rate country.If Iranian body armour is as cutting edge as their drones, I’d not wanting to be trusting my life to it.
The assigning of fault is such a pointless academic exercise in this case as intent is what matters if Russia deliberately launches missiles into Poland then it is an entirely different matter to a miscalculation.Exactly. Russia may not have intentionally lobbed a missile at Poland but its hardly an accident either. It’s entirely predictable that if you throw enough missiles at Ukraine one may land in Poland or a defence missile may go astray, either way it’s irrelevant whose missile it was as its 100% the fault of Russia.
The assigning of fault is such a pointless academic exercise in this case as intent is what matters if Russia deliberately launches missiles into Poland then it is an entirely different matter to a miscalculation.
Wagner boss is pure scum
How much S300 missile wreckage have you personally seen?. I haven't seen any so I can't comment.I literally posted some analysis of the wreckage on the previous page. It looks like S300 missile wreckage.
I only posted it because some of you were going neurotic on "it's WW3 now" talk.
That is from a OSINT account too. Twitter as usually trying to self reinforce itself from accounts who just are feeding off itself.
It's a little bit of a farce anyway, as POLAND themselves declared they had been attacked by Russia at first. Ukraine is OBVIOUSLY trying to take advantage of every situation to free their country. I prefer them not to do such, but this is war unfortunately.
As I thought it was 100% russian.....
Neither it seems.so is NATO going to be triggering article 5 against Ukraine for an attack on Poland? or? is it only if Russia accidentally has a missile fall in a NATO country?
I haven't seen any videos so I don't know if this has already been covered but... could it not be the warhead etc.. from an intercepted Russian missile on it's way to Kyiv?
Assuming they are not launched on a ballistic arc and have some level of terminal guidance, perhaps it was knocked out before the "decent phase" to it's target and the missile broke apart leaving the warhead hurtling towards a Polish village?
I remember the reports from back in the (1st I think?) Gulf War of the scud missiles falling on friendly / local villages etc.. even after being successfully "intercepted" in mid-air?
As I thought it was 100% russian.
NATO is covering it up for very good reasons, they don't want WW3. I feel for Ukraine but how far do we go?
In the Korean war McArthur went full crazy and wanted to invade China, they sacked him. Do we want to go McArthur on russia?
Ukraine said they intercepted ALL the Iranian drones that day!I believe Russia launched around 100 that day (the largest attack so far I understand), so I expect that is the explanation. If the world see's you launching missiles aggressively and someone get's hit, your likely to get the blame. Remember this wasn't an isolated attack.
Russian launched, but you knew what I meant.Oh great more CT misinformation or misdirection aka YT clickbait. Of course its russian all the ex-soviet bloc countries have stockpiles of these weapons they date back to the 1970's Ukraine has stockpiles of them its what they use to fire at russian incoming Poland has them too I imagine.
So yes its a russian made missile but that doesn't mean it has to have been launched from Russia or even Belarus as they don't have the range to fire from russia (93 miles maximum for S300's)
As I thought it was 100% russian.
NATO is covering it up for very good reasons, they don't want WW3. I feel for Ukraine but how far do we go?