You said the 7900XTX would have to cost £600, that's 83% less than the 4080.
To add to that PMR created the enviroment where that is even possible, and we still haven't learned.
Look again I said 7900xt
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You said the 7900XTX would have to cost £600, that's 83% less than the 4080.
To add to that PMR created the enviroment where that is even possible, and we still haven't learned.
What do you mean? These are the price differences between the cheapest models of each series. I mean have a look yourself.
Which is 19% cheaper, funny how statistics work. Anyway you can find a slightly cheaper 4080 and you don't have to search hard which brings it down to 18% cheaper.The 7900XTX starts at £890, the cheapest 4080 is £1100, that make the 4080 24% more expensive.
I agree the 7900XT is really a 7800XT but i don't see why it should be cheaper than its name sake replacement.Look again I said 7900xt
What 80% more?No one can compete in a market where the consumers think in a duopoly the guy with 90% market share's product's are worth 80% more for equivalent performance, that's absurd.
.
Which is 19% cheaper, funny how statistics work. Anyway you can find a slightly cheaper 4080 and you don't have to search hard which brings it down to 18% cheaper.
What 80% more?
AMD can't offer equivalentperformance/experience as Nvidia. Is that simple. Eg: They can't even run RT in Ratchet and Clank at launch...
The 7900XTX starts at £890, the cheapest 4080 is £1100, that make the 4080 24% more expensive.
7900 XTX MSRP for the MBA card was $999, which was exactly the same as the 6900 XT before it.£210 isn't aggressive enough when both are over priced in the first place, AMD followed suit and they decided to call it 7900xtx
That was a bug which was fixed in the updated driver released on Monday. https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/the-amd-driver-thread.18643923/post-36554377They can't even run RT in Ratchet and Clank at launch...
Right, it could "only" crash the driver, otherwise it was fineWeird that given actually it does.
£210 isn't aggressive enough when both are over priced in the first place, AMD followed suit and they decided to call it 7900xtx to make you feel like you getting something more when basically it's competing with the 4080
7900 XTX MSRP for the MBA card was $999, which was exactly the same as the 6900 XT before it.
What were were the 3080/4080 MSRPs again?
7900 XTX MSRP for the MBA card was $999, which was exactly the same as the 6900 XT before it.
What were were the 3080/4080 MSRPs again?
That was a bug which was fixed in the updated driver released on Monday. https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/the-amd-driver-thread.18643923/post-36554377
Clearly not and with that we are back at the beginning of this, how much is enough?
You do realise that it costs AMD money to make this sale for whatever it ends up being, its not free, just checking.....
The 4080 should really be no more than £800 though, personally I wouldn't buy one for a penny more than that and the same with a 7900XTX at £750.You said the 7900XTX would have to cost £600, that's 83% less than the 4080.
But it's replacing the 6900 XT, which was the same price and is 45-50% slower.But it's competing with the 4080 ? For around £210 less ?
Go on give me the exact profit margins per card for both companies
The 4080 should really be no more than £800 though.
Gen on gen Nvidia increase the MSRP by near 70%, AMD keep theirs the same, but its AMD who are too expensive and need to reduce the price.
That's the bat #### crazy we are dealing with.
Profit margins have been steadily growing for both companies. However one of two is also constantly losing marketshare.Go on give me the exact profit margins per card for both companies