I have an Atom v2. All the initial niggles have been ironed out and ERG is fine now. Absolutely love it - no regrets. Join "Wattbike Atom", and "Wattbike Atom Owners" FB groups and people often sell decent, little used models for £1,300 - £1,600.I've been reading reviews on the Atom v2. Seems to be lag with ERG mode but I wonder as a non-pro whether it would even affect me. However, it is the most affordable. The tacx + looks great and has the incline/decline function but eye watering price tag.
It's not surprising news they have closed it down. I tried RGT a couple of times when I had a SYSTM subscription but there are not enough people to make racing interesting.
I hope the rumour of Traineroad and Zwift merger appears again. I'd love a weekly race that fits within a structured training plan.
I'm a long time Sufferfest / Systm subscriber and hadn't even installed RGT as I was already on Zwift. The years free Zwift subscription as compensation for not using RGT (which I wasn't using) is a nice saving!
Yeah I mostly ignore the Zwift Plans there are some good ones on there though.I am considering buying a training program from TrainingPeaks as the more I look into training, the less convinced I become about using Zwift training programs. They are all over the place and seem a little more interested in making the workouts interesting than making them good or optimum. They are more focussed on mixing up the cadence and doing a mish-mash of things than focussing on the simple core of the session.
I don't mind paying for Zwift but honestly I watch youtube and netflix whenever I am on the trainer so the interactivity on Zwift isn't really that important. I assume that I could buy a good 8 week plan and then just reuse that and tweak it for my own purposes. I know that its not that hard to make my own plans but for $80 or something for 8 weeks its not bad and saves me time and effort.
I've thought the same about TP but it just looks so.... bland. I know that shoudn't matter too much but I like to have something to look at
Edit: I'm thinking of Trainer Road. not TP.
Yeah, the interface is rather dull and annoyingly doesn't work split screen on a iPad so I have to have 2 devices running.
For me between the 3:
Trainerroad:
Good:
Work out lengths are nice round numbers
Adaptive training
Can set days in a plan around your life
AI ftp detection
Bad:
Entertainment
Risk of burnout (not enough easy rides)
I feel like it is always pushing you to failure and then adapting down
Wahoo:
Good:
Entertaining videos/story arc
Good variety
Intensity seems to be just right to get the most out of you via 4DP
Better interface for showing rpm/instructions
Bad:
A lot of short rides when doing a plan
Can't set workout days in a plan
Hour long FTP tests (I don't disagree with the results, it is just undesirable)
Zwift:
Good:
Racing when at the top of the power categories
Unstructured rides
Festive 500 is great motivation
Bad:
Doesn't know what it is doing with structured training
I've had good results with Wahoo during my winter builds in previous years. I did try trainerroad last spring and was unconvinced but wanted to try it with a closer goal rather then no goals in the plan. My best FTP yet was last year after doing festive 500 in Zwift so will be doing trainerroad until Christmas, then a month of Zwift and then deciding where to go.
I'm interested in how this works and how accurate you think it is? I know intervals.icu tries to suggest my FTP and has been 20-25W higher than I've ever tested, but tbf I probably do put better efforts in chasing a PR up a climb than I do on a ramp test...AI ftp detection
I'm interested in how this works and how accurate you think it is? I know intervals.icu tries to suggest my FTP and has been 20-25W higher than I've ever tested, but tbf I probably do put better efforts in chasing a PR up a climb than I do on a ramp test...
Interesting, thanks. How about the 'how does it work' element? Is it the same as intervals and just bases it off your recent results?