Associate
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2020
- Posts
- 2,088
Using the settings in that vid:
7800XT MBA card no driver tweaks.
Core Ultra 285k (Intel baseline profile) and with no info on ram speeds and timings in the Chinese leak, I used a 6400 XMP profile which is what reviewers were given as baseline testing for Core Ultra CPU's.
Win11 24H2 Intel PR5 fixes and bios updates in place.
Now comparing this to the original Chinese leak on X and using a 7800XT to compare with (at the supposed same settings) , looks like the 9070XT is a little monster considering the amount of shaders it actually has.
All boils down to street prices now, not imaginary MSRP's.
![]()
I ran this benchmark today on a heavily overclocked and undervolted 7800XT mba at 1080p and FSR Quality and Frame gen on with Ultra settings and RT off (are those the alleged settings on the leaked 9070xt benchmark?)
Radeon drivers 25.2.1
7800XT
Overclock settings
Min core 2750
Max core 2950
998mv voltage PL15%
Vram Fast timings
2578mhz
Fans at 75%
Usually get a GT1 Timespy extreme of 67fps
And a Timespy graphics score of 22176.
Got a score of 29610 and average FPS of 173.98
So that makes mine about 21% behind the alleged 9070xt so not bad really! Not sure it’s worth me upgrading to a 9070xt after all?
Thoughts anyone?
Last edited: