I did wonder as folk had said full removal for any left over bits of data from the previous card.Same drivers so just turn off your PC and put the new one in. It will pick up the higher clock and power
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I did wonder as folk had said full removal for any left over bits of data from the previous card.Same drivers so just turn off your PC and put the new one in. It will pick up the higher clock and power
Looks like not far off the score for my current pulse even though it isn't a clocker. Score of 7372 and 73.7fpsI have a 9070XT Pulse. Great card for sub msrp price I got from elsewhere after a discount.
Vram temps on load max 75c with fans on a curve.
Boosts to 3.2ghz core after an UV of -95mv with PL at 10% and vram fast timings at 2746mhz.
Getting Steel Nomad of 7445 and 74.5fps and Timespy extreme Graphics score of 97.7fps. The Nitro gets 103 according to TPU so 5fps in it- both fan shrouds are plastic not metal- Nitro looks better and your paying 10% more (£619 vs £684 if it’s from the same elsewhere I got my pulse from) for 5% more performance.
It’s really evens what is better- I’d go for whichever you think looks better and you’re happy with in your case.
I generally look for optimisation videos on YouTube. You can generally get better visibility for lesser settings with some minor tweaks.Playing Black Ops 6 and Warzone, I'm getting between 100-120 FPS on my 9070 at 1440p. Does that seem normal?
FSR4 enabled in game and driver settings, no frame gen or upscaling. Textures normal, Detail Quality High, particles High, Shaders High, Shadows Normal. Others high
Sounds like you’re talking about your RAM and graphics memory try interchangeably.Which is better for gaming? Xmp enabled or leave xmp off and manually oc memory with fast timings in adrenaline. Reason I ask I can get the memory up to nearly 2900mhz fast timings with xmp disabled but 2800mh max with xmp. In steel nomad score was higher with xmp disabled n left at stock n OC in adrenaline. Obviously benchmarks are not real world scenario
Only 5% behind the 4080 is impressive considering the price
Honestly what's more impressive to me is that the 4090 is only 36% more performance and was at least double the price only a few months ago before it was discontinued
The improvement from FSR3 to FSR4 is crazy,Black Ops 6 looks like a remaster in comparisonOptiscaler compatibility list showing 137 games working wth FSR4 but there will be many still to be added. Practically any DLSS game can be injected with FSR4 without any problems. We can also add the 40-50 games with official FSR4 support to that list
https://github.com/cdozdil/OptiScaler/wiki/FSR4-Compatibility-List
Ryzen 75700x and 32GB DDR4. I feel I should be getting more than I am.I generally look for optimisation videos on YouTube. You can generally get better visibility for lesser settings with some minor tweaks.
I'm getting around 220-260fps with the pulse XT at 1440p.
What CPU and RAM have you got? Warzone was always quite sensitive to that.
I must be doing something wrong, when I enable FSR3 in Black Ops I get worse performance.The improvement from FSR3 to FSR4 is crazy,Black Ops 6 looks like a remaster in comparison