Jeffrey Epstein

Trumps name is apparently all over the Epstein flight logs. Despite his assurances a week or so ago, the logs won't ever see the light of day. Or if they do they'll be heavily redacted.
Epstein was just running a very exclusive taxi company even though Trump literally has his own jet, nothing sus at all.
 
Trumps name is apparently all over the Epstein flight logs. Despite his assurances a week or so ago, the logs won't ever see the light of day. Or if they do they'll be heavily redacted.

Didn't Trump ban Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for hitting on a young teenager there though? you would think that if Epstein had dirt on him then he wouldn't have been able to do that, or if they were partners in crime (good friends) he would have just had a quiet word with him not to do it on his property again.

I think people need to differentiate between those who were associated with Epstein and those who fell into his honeypot trap, just because someone accepted his invitations to fly somewhere or spoke to him at a party doesn't automatically mean they are guilty of having sex with children.

Hopefully we'll see prosecutions one day but I doubt it since if you are wealthy and famous or in a position of power you are generally above the law these days or so it seems.
 
Last edited:
Didn't Trump ban Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for hitting on a young teenager there though? you would think that if Epstein had dirt on him then he wouldn't have been able to do that, or if they were partners in crime (good friends) he would have just had a quiet word with him not to do it on his property again.

I think people need to differentiate between those who were associated with Epstein and those who fell into his honeypot trap, just because someone accepted his invitations to fly somewhere or spoke to him at a party doesn't automatically mean they are guilty of having sex with children.

Hopefully we'll see prosecutions one day but I doubt it since if you are wealthy and famous or in a position of power you are generally above the law these days or so it seems.
Am I meant to believe that Trump's multi-decade long behaviour of skirting the laws making him feel invincible as well as a distinct lack of anything approaching empathy and multiple instances of him implying through statements that he hasn't partaken in such acts? Hmm.
 
Didn't Trump ban Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for hitting on a young teenager there though? you would think that if Epstein had dirt on him then he wouldn't have been able to do that, or if they were partners in crime (good friends) he would have just had a quiet word with him not to do it on his property again.

I think people need to differentiate between those who were associated with Epstein and those who fell into his honeypot trap, just because someone accepted his invitations to fly somewhere or spoke to him at a party doesn't automatically mean they are guilty of having sex with children.

Hopefully we'll see prosecutions one day but I doubt it since if you are wealthy and famous or in a position of power you are generally above the law these days or so it seems.
This is the same Trump that said he would be dating a 10 year old in 10 years time

 
Last edited:
If you think for even one second that Trump wouldn't get inappropriate with minors I think you might be very sorely mistaken.
 
Back
Top Bottom