How likely do we think it is of getting Zen6 this year?
2%
I don't know.
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
How likely do we think it is of getting Zen6 this year?
I went from a 5800X3D to a 9800X3d and the gaming performance uplift is sizeable.On a 5800x with a 5080 GPU and I've got the upgrade bug. Question is when? 9800x3d now or hold out for zen 6?
Same here, not in all titles, but games like Darktide and Space Marine 2 saw a very healthy uplift.I went from a 5800X3D to a 9800X3d and the gaming performance uplift is sizeable
Excellent, this coupled with 12 core ccd's, Zen6 is going to be monstrous![]()
AMD Zen 6 to primarily use TSMC N2P, N3P for low-end mobile SKUs - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 10000, aka Zen6 with N2P node AMD has allegedly shared information with its partners regarding next-generation CPU architecture nodes. The new series will once again cover server, desktop, and mobile platforms. The leaker, who has a good track record with confidential AMD plans...videocardz.com
I'm sure it will be tempting for AMD if they can release something that's stable at anything near that speed - only got to be 6.3Ghz to be the highest clocked production processor (currently i9-14900KS has this title @ 6.2Ghz)Rumours are quite insane 7Ghz
Because it's Intel.I don't understand in this day and age why you'd even buy any Intel CPU?
I think the 245K/265K at current prices offer much better value than AMD's chips at the same price points (for people that do more than game).I don't understand in this day and age why you'd even buy any Intel CPU?
They majorly lack the cache that AMD has, run far too hot, thermal throttle even on the best of coolers, perform worse in games, often cost more or the same?
What exactly is the benefit over AMD? I'm all for buying whatever works best, but currently, that is AMD, whatever price range you choose.
Is that based on pricing wise or performance? Or both?I think the 245K/265K at current prices offer much better value than AMD's chips at the same price points (for people that do more than game).
Extra L3 cache is not a silver bullet, most application gain nothing from it. The 245K/265K offer better price/performance than AMD at that price point, the Intel iGPU is also a lot better for builds that don't include a dGPU. AMD are mostly better for gaming but its not so clear cut for other things.Is that based on pricing wise or performance? Or both?
I struggle to see why someone would buy an Intel when they lack the cache of AMD, there are so many options with AMD X3D, and more keep being released, I saw the other day a 7600X3D IIRC? That would be a great CPU if we get it over here.
I'm sure it will be tempting for AMD if they can release something that's stable at anything near that speed - only got to be 6.3Ghz to be the highest clocked production processor (currently i9-14900KS has this title @ 6.2Ghz)
Extra L3 cache is not a silver bullet, most application gain nothing from it. The 245K/265K offer better price/performance than AMD at that price point, the Intel iGPU is also a lot better for builds that don't include a dGPU. AMD are mostly better for gaming but its not so clear cut for other things.
In multithreaded applications, 265K is massively faster((Cinebench 23 MC)35700 vs 23120). In gaming most would not notice the difference between 265K/9700X.I multithreaded applications yes because they have a bunch of E-Cores, in gaming, no, the Ryzen 9700X is faster than the 265K and £20 cheaper.
The problem Intel have is they don't really have any gaming CPU's that are worth their money, because they do a little better in MT productivity apps they think they are worth more than AMD's CPU's, they aren't....