Weapons

Soldato
Joined
13 Mar 2007
Posts
15,435
Location
South Yorkshire

No doubt their forcing to watch on Youtube due to some of the scenes in the trailer, looks to be one of the better horrors of recent times.

August 8th.

From New Line Cinema and Zach Cregger, the wholly original mind behind Barbarian, comes a new horror/thriller: Weapons.

When all but one child from the same class mysteriously vanish on the same night at exactly the same time, a community is left questioning who or what is behind their disappearance.
 
Last edited:
Looks interesting!

In May 2023, Pedro Pascal and Renate Reinsve were cast to star in the film. In February 2024, Pascal exited the project due to his commitments to the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) film The Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025)
Oh thank God
 
"Because the night before at 2:17 in the morning every kid ... "

Wait what?


Either it was 2:17am the morning of the school day, therefore not the "night before" or if it was the "night before", meaning the preceding day then everyone would have been aware the children were missing.
 
Last edited:
Disappointing 5/10

This film reminds me a lot of Longlegs. The first half of the movie felt too bloated and sluggish. Just as the tension begins to build, the film shifts perspective, retelling events through another character's eyes. Even after the ‘mystery’ is revealed, the story doesn't progress further, leaving no real explanations. The film then inexplicably concludes with a chase sequence reminiscent of Benny Hill.
 
Just out of the cinema and I completely disagree, It was brilliant imo. Really intriguing how it unfolded. Was fully engaged from start to finish. The run time of 2 hours 17 mins flew by. If you liked Barbarian you will love this. Very surprised how much I enjoyed it. Will write a full review later. Easily 8/10 imo.

@Nitefly - Definitely one for you!!
 
Last edited:
I'll catch it in a few weeks it was on my list for August but it's barely on show here just very late nights.
 
Thanks @Kyo - I’ve heard great things about this, looking forward to it and also ‘Together’ out later this month =]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kyo
Disappointing 5/10

This film reminds me a lot of Longlegs. The first half of the movie felt too bloated and sluggish. Just as the tension begins to build, the film shifts perspective, retelling events through another character's eyes. Even after the ‘mystery’ is revealed, the story doesn't progress further, leaving no real explanations. The film then inexplicably concludes with a chase sequence reminiscent of Benny Hill.
I was going to go and watch this as the trailer looked interesting but could do without wasting another couple hours in the cinema after the fantastic 4 **** show.
 
Last edited:
Wrote this the other night elsewhere....so just c'n'p

OK, but didn't quite deliver what I'd hoped for. Have never revisited Barbarian since it's original release, but recall being impressed with the setup and initial half, but as they story revealed itself, the interest level dropped off a bit sharper than I would have hoped. Still a finely crafted movie evident of a creator who knew what they wanted on the screen, so I was looking forward to his second solo effort.

Other than the trailer, I'd avoided anything about it - hadn't even heard how it had been received for fear of some comment spoiling something - so was looking forward to a somewhat blank slate tonight. Looked right up my street, and while it was always in the back of my mind that the actual 'revelation' of the mystery would be unlikely to completely satisfy, I was still hopeful of a unique and enjoyable couple hours. Does Cregger succeed ? I'd say yes………….and no.

It's a somewhat patchy and tonally mixed tale, that while finely crafted and entertaining, doesn't quite scratch the itch, or at least not consistently enough, but there's enough to keep the viewer engaged. Much like Barbarian, there's a deliberate pace to the opening half, here with the use of POV chaptering, which probably could have been tighter in all honesty. It's a brave way to frame a story - not uniquely original by any means - but some sections do suffer somewhat bogging the flow down. It's always a fine line for the viewer in these cases, needing something to keep them engaged as different perspectives are told, and while it broadly succeeds, I can see were some will have issues with it - certainly an opportunity to take 10-15mins or at least use them differently. Cregger's comedy bone is allowed to come through a lot of these sections, gradually turning into the frequent spots of dark humour that permeate through the remainder of the film. Sort of a reverse 'Mom and Dad' on occasion, which I wouldn't be surprised to find on Cregger's media shelf. The dark fable, almost Grimm story-telling, aspect of the film is, again, nothing we've not seen before and borrows heavily from many sources, but it allows the mystery to be set extremely early in the runtime gradually moving into full-on territory in the final third.

It's sort of the appeal and the flaw of the movie overall. There's so much variety on show and thrown at the audience, that it doesn't all gel, or at least set sufficiently. That said, it's the variety on show that keeps the viewer engaged and even when it drops into absurdity, it's generally in keeping with proceedings. To have it all contained in a two hour runtime is admirable and clearly needed a talented creator, but it also partly explains that nagging unsatisfying feeling when leaving the showing IMO.

Performances are grand throughout, including one or two little surprises not covered by press or trailers, with Garner and Brolin taking the meat of things. Use of music in parts works well, even if there appeared to be a somewhat dodgy audio mix where I had watched it, but I'll put that down to the cinema.

Looking at some of the online reviews post-viewing, it appears quite positive, and while I'd not be quite as effusive as some I've seen, I think most people would take to it or get something from it. It's not deep by any means, and if your expectations don't require too much in the way of explanation, then the overall mystery or lack thereof succeeds in the main.
 
Can see why all the studios were all fighting to secure the rights and script. Not bad for only a $38 million budget.
 
Last edited:
From the daily film review thread, but throwing my 2p in here too:

*** Mini-essay warning ***

Weapons (at the Cinema)

A classroom of children disappear in the middle of the night, leaving everyone to deal with the aftermath.

You know… I feel like we are now firmly in the ‘post-Hereditary’ era. The industry seems to be moving away from ‘raw discomfort’. Oppressive atmosphere is out, creative storytelling and being different is in… but there is something else lingering in the mix too. I detect… a certain ‘aloofness’, almost as if films want to create genuine tension… but then back out with a winking smiling face saying, “no, that would be too serious… we weren’t trying that hard, really ;)”… possible as a fear of being criticised…? I’m not sure.

Is this sort of film really smart? Or is it too cool for school?

Anyway, this film plays out like an anthology of overlapping short stories, not entirely dissimilar to the style of ‘Memento’ if you’ve seen that, where you see things from different perspectives and get a little bit more of the whole picture each time.

The intrigue is very strong for first two thirds - high marks for that. There’s a few menacing moments heavy on suspense, with fairly decent character building - although it’s a notable stylistic choice that there isn’t a particularly ‘likeable’ adult lead to root for. There’s some ‘everyday life’ humour too, which works well.

Eventually the film’s trajectory ‘crystallises’, with a standoff that ends up suddenly leaning hard into ‘silly’ humour, before a very abrupt and aloof ending that doesn’t seem to linger on any particular note. The journey is more satisfying than the destination, I think.

There is a constant, ongoing refrain of characters loudly remarking ‘wtf?!’ - which almost seems like an ‘in joke’ for the filmmakers by the end, in defiance of how little this is said in horror films historically.

I think this film will polarise people. The artsy horror type might say, “Bravo! This is so different and fresh!”, the ‘everyman’ will think, “Oh - well bits were good but that was strange.” Then someone in the middle like me… also a big horror fan… might think it’s more interesting as a ‘zeitgeist-piece’ than it is ‘brilliant’.

If you want an intrigue heavy film and appreciate things being different, you’ll find a lot to like. On the other hand, if you disliked ‘Longlegs’ and have a tendency to prefer ‘familiarity’ rather than films that take risky creative decisions, you might be disappointed.

7/10 - as a one and done, possibly being generous and adding half mark just for making me ponder about the genre as a whole.

P.s. I don’t dislike this ‘new wave’ direction… but, in truth, I think Final Destination: Bloodlines might be my horror pick of the year so far. That wore its heart on its sleeve…
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kyo
Back
Top Bottom