Today's mass shooting in the US

Status
Not open for further replies.
Republicans have been sharing footage of an elderly white man arrested at the event, claiming he is the shooter. Turns out... he's not. It's unclear if police have even identified the shooter yet.


Is he conscious yet? A jugular hit could mean he’s stable but with brain damage. It’s probably far too early to say.

No news about whether or not he's conscious. But seeing as he made it to the hospital alive, I'll be very surprised if he doesn't pull through.

Meanwhile, in people whose death Charlie Kirk thought was "worth it", 3 students were killed in yet another mass shooting.

Injured, but not killed.
 
Last edited:
Bald podcaster Tim Pool says 'sources' have told him Kirk is stable.

yeah nah, saw the video, there is no surviving that im sorry. quite clear it must have been a rifle, in and out wound, sliced the artery too, as soon as kirk was hit he slumped over with huge blood pouring out
 
Last edited:
yeah nah, saw the video, there is no surviving that im sorry. quite clear it must have been a rifle, in and out wound, sliced the artery too, as soon as kirk was hit he slumped over with huge blood pouring out

Well they said he was taken alive to the hospital, so I figured it looked worse than it was. But yeah, he's dead.

 
Well I didn't realise he was some ocuk General pin-up boy, but yeah there are very few people in the world who deserve to go out like that in front of their family and kids. To think otherwise is really bloody weird.
 
So you're inferring he believes school shootings are worth it, rather than listening to what was actually said - got it.

FWIW, I have never agreed with his take on 2nd amendment rights, but to come out and claim he said "School shootings are worth gun ownership" is ridiculous.
This is the problem with the media but then also it's readers.
The media play to a headline that suits them, it might be a bit more creative than what has been said.
Their viewers take headlines as true words and base their entire argument off of a creative angle of a quote.
 
Rather than go off headlines, did you actually listen to what he said?

He said this:

Charlie Kirk said:
You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am—I think it's worth it. I think it's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.

That's not a headline, it's a direct quote.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom