Opticians | Glasses & Contact Lenses
Find your local Specsavers store to book an appointment online. Why not buy / browse glasses & contact lenses online or try our FREE hearing check?
Greenlizard0 Premier League Football Thread ** spoilers ** [13th - 14th September 2025]
- Thread starter explicit4u
- Start date
Ok that looks a lot worse than the static pic
Opticians | Glasses & Contact Lenses
Find your local Specsavers store to book an appointment online. Why not buy / browse glasses & contact lenses online or try our FREE hearing check?www.specsavers.co.uk
Already been m8
Did you get a receipt?
Yes, blinkers firmly onDid you get a receipt?
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 9,941
- Location
- newcastle
Burnley player should have gone in the 1st half
Think that’s why the second yellow looked so soft as the ref ****** up in not sending him off in the first place
you'd do an odd jump yourself if some big unit of a fella had just slid through you.
Prior to the tackle, he sort of jumps with both feet
Maybe because out of the corner of his eye he saw said fella about to wipe him out.
Maybe
just rewatched - yea, it's not too dissimilar to that weird 2 footed jump/lunge Lisandro Martinez is fond of......maybe an Argentinian thing
Who? Does he play for us?
As manic said, the encroaching player has to have an impact for it to be an offence. Had Salah's penalty been saved and Frimpong challenged for the rebound, which resulted in a goal, it would have been ruled out. Similarly if a Burnley player had encroached and challenged for or cleared the rebound, it would be an offence and a retake ordered.
Would he be allowed to pass the rebound to Salah or could Salah pass the rebound to him?
If the answer is no either then why are they allowed in, surely they distract the keeper in doing so?
If Frimpong had touched the rebound or even challenged a Burnley player that was attempting to clear the rebound then it would be a foul.
As for why they're allowed in, I suppose the answer is because it's inconsequential. As soon as there's a consequence of their encroachment, it's an offence. Had he been stood on the 6 yard line waving his arms in front of the keeper then you can maybe argue that he's distracting him but he wasn't. I highly doubt keepers are focusing even the slightest bit on forwards/defenders following in the penalty, let alone somebody off centre making their run fractionally too early.
Did you read my post?
As for why they're allowed in the box, it's more that ruling out a goal for a minor encroachment which has had no impact would be entirely disproportionate.
Yes
So what part of this section didn't answer your question about whether he could pass to Salah or vice versa?
"the encroaching player plays the ball or challenges an opponent for the ball and then scores, attempts to score or creates a goal-scoring opportunity"
I was thinking they might be allowed on a second touch, keeper > taker > intruder
There must be a reason they run in, I don't buy that it's not distracting