You definitely took damage/died from falling buildings in the open beta, wonder if it's different in the test environment or something changed. I definitely died to that bridge collapsing on the small city map.
Last edited:
——The Official Battlefield 6 Thread——
- Thread starter Neil79
- Start date
It was sketchy at best in the beta, i found myself walking through it with no damage sometimes and other times it did do damage. That's from rubble falling from walls being blown apart at least.
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,117
- Location
- Blackburn
Definitely, I thought the single hit to walls and floors looked bad enoughReddit - The heart of the internet
www.reddit.com
Think this needs dialled back a tad. And still zero player damage from rubble. Hopefully not the case in the final game.
It's all looks scripted. In the beta you'd hit a building with RPG, front of building falls off, poof of smoke/dust to hide the disappearing falling rubble and rubble growing out of the ground. A bit of a same really because it always seems to look the same every time and not dynamic as they made out in the trailers.
Thing is DICE made a big deal about how amazing the destruction is in BF6 so obviously people are going to analyse it.
People need to stop being so precious about games...
In the latest labs test choppers had seem improvements and I think it was mentioned ground vehicles speed increased. Hopefully thats wrong because they felt pretty speedy already imo.
Ive also heard reports that in jets now you just need to press two buttons and a direction to do maneuvers. Pretty lame if true.
The server player counts are too high in BF6, lucky portal can fix that. Battlefield has traditionally been about driving or running for a bit, picking your spots and then entering combat or taking objectives, but EA has tried to turn it into CoD where no matter what map you play on, it's like CoD and every two seconds and around every single corner is an enemy and it's non stop bang bang bang gun fire
Last edited:
I can kind of see why - BF4 2/3rds of the active player base I believe is playing 64 player conquest large on mostly Lockers and Metro. BF5 similar kind of trend, not sure about BF1.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,957
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
Unfortunately if you want that old school bf, you need to try arma reforger
Or use BF2hub, having a blast in BF2, squad play still the best. The BF6 maps are so small it makes air vehicles worthless and a bore to use.
I'm aware of that trend and it is unfortunate. Whether or not it's still the case, the original reason for maps like 64 metro being popular is the more densely packed players are the easier it is to get kills and the higher your kill per minute ratio is, the faster you can level up and get new unlocks, so really it was about grinding XP as fast as possible and not about enjoyment
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,957
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
I highly suggest you try arma reforger, it’s on consoles too as well. It peaked at around 18k of players on steam
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,738
- Location
- London
It looks excellent.
Last edited:
Reforger is great but you spend far too much time getting around and too little in combat - its almost the exact opposite of combat around every turn.
Hell let Loose has the best balance imho but im so sick of WW2.
Last edited:
Looks a lot of fun, also even though it's just the campaign it gets me excited thinking that they'll be able to have elements like this in the multiplayer.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 6,530
- Location
- West Sussex
Really didn't want to buy this as i'm carp at multiplay, but that single player gameplay looks good