and also think their conclusion that Jaguar was not profitable enough and the way to fix it is to add another £50k+ onto their prices is ....... odd
you missed the important part out of my point however....... the part about their reputation for poor reliability and long wait times / dodgy customer services.Jaguar tried to move in to the low profit/high volume market and failed so it's not a conclusion of opinion that it's not profitable - the P&L for years says it's not profitable. But if the J of JLR tries for low profit per car but high volume and fails while the LR of JLR succeeds in low volume and high profit per car - is it that odd to move Jaguar towards the Land Rover method? I don't think so. Will it work though? I guess we'll have to re-visit this thread in a few years.


I think it is pretty universally dislikedto be fair as much as i do not like the new rebrand... i almost think if Farage, Trump and GB news do not like it then maybe i need to re-evaluate![]()
--------------He is also currently on the boards of Tata Consumer, Air India and Titan Industries.
Mr Balaji started his career with Unilever in 1995 and worked in different corporate finance roles across Asian markets, Switzerland, UK and India.
He joined Tata Motors after his last assignment with Hindustan Unilever, a $6billion enterprise, where he headed the finance function as CFO.
An alumnus of the Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, Mr Balaji has a post‑graduate degree in management from the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta.
has someone already done a (AI?) donald trump responds meme/videos in same manner as the classic Hitler ones, would be a gold-mine.And just for the lols..
What's that got to do with Jag
I don't mind it, reminds me a lot of when the original TT was revealed many years ago.
.I hope it's not.I hope tax payer's money is going to bailing this out.
And your source that India was the problem? Or is this just another sweeping generalisationAll because they were dumb enough to outsouce their IT to India.
but like with british steel foreign owners - hopefully chancellor ensures we are not blackmailed and that the owners/shareholders share some of the costsThe breach appears to have originated through a third-party supplier. M&S’s IT helpdesk is run by Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and executives later admitted that the hackers first compromised this contractor. In practice, the attackers used social engineering to trick helpdesk staff into handing over access: they rang support desks posing as internal IT, obtained credentials or password resets, and then infiltrated the M&S network.
I hope it's not.
Suppliers to JLR have privately expressed anger about the government’s messaging, which appeared to take credit for helping them. An executive at one parts maker said: “In some ways the government played a blinder with everyone thinking they bailed out JLR. They did nothing.”
Several sources told the Guardian that none of that loan facility had gone into JLR’s accounts, nor had any gone to any of its suppliers. Instead, the carmaker used its existing large cash reserves for its scheme to help suppliers.
Good, I'd rather it folded than have taxpayers money.Well good job it hasn’t then.
![]()
Ministers’ claims to have helped JLR in doubt as £1.5bn support left untouched
Exclusive: No cyber-attack assistance cash has gone into carmaker’s accounts or to struggling supplierswww.theguardian.com
And your source that India was the problem? Or is this just another sweeping generalisation