Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Hopefully Powercolor will honor their $400 promise; although I wouldn't be surprised if EU prices will be jacked up as usual.
I think thats what @Martini1991 predicted and would appear to be the smarter short term move, however if it doesnt yield any better clocks it may not be worth it unless your wanting quieter room on intense sessions.
What do you use to tune it m8, Wattman? Also what is the max rpm you use? Mine is topping out around 78c with Auto UV.
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/683...rx-5700-et-rx-5700-xt-deja-en-fin-de-vie.html
I cannot vouch for the veracity of this article but they claim that the rx5700 reference series is already moribund. Only 4 weeks post launch! What's going on here? It seems like the excessive thermals and noise levels due to the blower design has resulted in a backdraft of ubiquitous complaints (pardon the pun). Quite the barn burner for Nvidia that can comfortably sell 10% more performance at a 25% premium. Who jebaited whom here, Scott?
Looks like a 4.7% improvement in clocks for 25% increase in price. Sure, its a bit quieter, but I'm not sure that really justifies the cost.
No, AMD don't sell reference cards for very long and it's quite normal to see them vanish once AIB models show up. Which is always a pain if you want to watercool.https://www.cowcotland.com/news/683...rx-5700-et-rx-5700-xt-deja-en-fin-de-vie.html
I cannot vouch for the veracity of this article but they claim that the rx5700 reference series is already moribund. Only 4 weeks post launch! What's going on here? It seems like the excessive thermals and noise levels due to the blower design has resulted in a backdraft of ubiquitous complaints (pardon the pun). Quite the barn burner for Nvidia that can comfortably sell 10% more performance at a 25% premium. Who jebaited whom here, Scott?
No, AMD don't sell reference cards for very long and it's quite normal to see them vanish once AIB models show up. Which is always a pain if you want to watercool.
Plus, "excessive thermals and noise" is overly dramatic, isn't it? Or have you just been watching too many YouTubers who don't know what they're doing? Because there are plenty of actual owners of the 5700XT who all disagree with how hot and noisy the stock blower is, and the 5700 never even had the problem to begin with.
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/683...rx-5700-et-rx-5700-xt-deja-en-fin-de-vie.html
I cannot vouch for the veracity of this article but they claim that the rx5700 reference series is already moribund. Only 4 weeks post launch! What's going on here? It seems like the excessive thermals and noise levels due to the blower design has resulted in a backdraft of ubiquitous complaints (pardon the pun). Quite the barn burner for Nvidia that can comfortably sell 10% more performance at a 25% premium. Who jebaited whom here, Scott?
As someone who owns a 5700XT reference.
The issue is exaggerated on both sides.
But I'm sick of people pretending that it's better than what it is just as much as I'm sick of people pretending it's 4000 rpm at stock.
Default 5700XT is hot as the sun, audible but not loud.
No, AMD don't sell reference cards for very long and it's quite normal to see them vanish once AIB models show up. Which is always a pain if you want to watercool.
Plus, "excessive thermals and noise" is overly dramatic, isn't it? Or have you just been watching too many YouTubers who don't know what they're doing? Because there are plenty of actual owners of the 5700XT who all disagree with how hot and noisy the stock blower is, and the 5700 never even had the problem to begin with.
The thing is, it doesn't matter what I think. The first impression is everything and every major reviewer slated the card. Even if the blower cooler isn't all that bad as depicted, this could all have been avoided if AMD didn't cheap out on cooling. I bet there is a large amount of people who got the 5700xt in the hype only to return it due to unreasonable thermals and malfunctioning software-- instead choosing nvidia for painless plug and play and solid temps. AMD could have captured the momentum from the Ryzen launch and established themselves as kings of midrange in the GPU segment; instead people had to wait 6 weeks for proper cooling from partners and battle the buggy software.
I just think they lost a huge opportunity by obsequiously trying to appease their partners' by releasing a borderline acceptable reference card.
The card is as hot as every other card out there, including the Nvidia ones. And if the reviewers do not put the fan at 100% speed, like many did but others didn't, you will see the card is as noisy as the whole Nvidia Turing dual fan lineup, and less noisy than the Pascal blowers.
Except if a 38.5db EVGA 2070S XC is a lot less loud than a 39db 5700XT reference somehow (when the microphone is put next to the card, not the usual position over half meter away from the ears)
Or the 79C of the 2060S & 2070S (with dual fan cooler) are "having so much better thermals", than the 5700XT at 80C with the blower. On the same review!!!!!!!!!!!!!