Intel Cannonlake, Cascade Lake, Ice Lake, Tiger Lake & Sapphire Rapid thread

4K8KW10 · 2 Oct 2019 at 19:47

intel used chiplets more than 10 years ago, and they actually scaled. Core 2 Quad was faster than Core 2 Duo.

Rroff · 2 Oct 2019 at 19:53

4K8KW10 said:
intel used chiplets more than 10 years ago, and they actually scaled. Core 2 Quad was faster than Core 2 Duo.

Even going through the NB the Core 2 Quads had fairly low core to core latency - Intel has all the R&D for chiplets, etc. mostly it has been a mix of trickling out advances to consumers and problems with their 10nm node that have stalled things.

humbug · 2 Oct 2019 at 21:28

4K8KW10 said:
intel used chiplets more than 10 years ago, and they actually scaled. Core 2 Quad was faster than Core 2 Duo.

Not quite the same thing.

4K8KW10 · 2 Oct 2019 at 21:29

RavenXXX2 said:
Intel 10th Gen Core-X Series (Cascade Lake X) final specs and pricing leaked

https://videocardz.com/82105/intel-...cascade-lake-x-final-specs-and-pricing-leaked

12/24 i9-10920XE = 630 EUR
12/24 TR 2920X = 593 EUR
12/24 9 3900X = 662 EUR

Err ? ?

sandys · 2 Oct 2019 at 21:38

you can also overclock the ring and like overclocking other bits o Intel its a doddle.

Panos · 2 Oct 2019 at 21:40

4K8KW10 said:
12/24 i9-10920XE = 630 EUR
12/24 TR 2920X = 593 EUR
12/24 9 3900X = 662 EUR

Err ? ?

3900X €520 with VAT in Germany and in stock.

Grim5 · 2 Oct 2019 at 21:48

Lucky it's usually out of stock
3950x going to be even worse

Orange Nexus · 2 Oct 2019 at 21:52

Orange Nexus said:
My guestimate for the KS would be - £299.

Man, i was way off. lol

RSR · 2 Oct 2019 at 22:22

Edit: Ill get one from else where.

Grim5 · 2 Oct 2019 at 22:53

Gigabyte shows off new X299X motherboards for Cascade Lake X launch

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/gigabyte-x299x-motherboard-cascade-lake-x-cpus-intel,40536.html

Including the Ultra high end X299X waterforce - with a HUGE waterblock that cools the CPU, 16 phase VRM, Chipset and M2 Drives!

Panos · 2 Oct 2019 at 23:15

Grim5 said:
Gigabyte shows off new X299X motherboards for Cascade Lake X launch

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/gigabyte-x299x-motherboard-cascade-lake-x-cpus-intel,40536.html

Including the Ultra high end X299X waterforce - with a HUGE waterblock that cools the CPU, 16 phase VRM, Chipset and M2 Drives!

Yeah that Aorus Waterforge is really great looking board. And tbh X299 always had great motherboards, and trust me I greatly regret not getting a 7900X back in 2017 when had opportunity, with an EVGA X299 Dark.

Nutella33 · 2 Oct 2019 at 23:30

B1gbeard said:
If you had of pointed it out then that would have been great, you didn't.

Here you go.

Nutella33 said:
And is Intels top offering against a midrange Threadripper part. The comparison for 10980XE should be vs the 2970wx since they share the same price bracket.

sideways14a · 3 Oct 2019 at 00:07

The comparisons for the 10bla bla blas should be Threadripper 3 as thats what everyone is going to be buying anyway.
And i dont think it is going to be a good laugh for team blue. A slaughter maybe.

Grim5 · 3 Oct 2019 at 00:30

sideways14a said:
The comparisons for the 10bla bla blas should be Threadripper 3 as thats what everyone is going to be buying anyway.
And i dont think it is going to be a good laugh for team blue. A slaughter maybe.

well i'm not considering threadripper for a mainly gaming system

sideways14a · 3 Oct 2019 at 00:59

Same with these 10things then, they are HEDT.

pmc25 · 4 Oct 2019 at 00:46

I'm doubtful that a 10920XE at 5.2Ghz and pulling nearly 500W will match an auto overclocked 9900K @4.9 or a Ryzen 3700X / 3800X / 3900X / 3950X with IF 1900 / DDR4 3800 in gaming.

It probably won't beat the 3900X (or any TR4 3xxx chip) in anything except workloads relying heavily on AVX 512 and Photoshop / Premiere (because they're dinosauric piles of xxxx).

Panos · 4 Oct 2019 at 04:11

pmc25 said:
I'm doubtful that a 10920XE at 5.2Ghz and pulling nearly 500W will match an auto overclocked 9900K @4.9 or a Ryzen 3700X / 3800X / 3900X / 3950X with IF 1900 / DDR4 3800 in gaming.

It probably won't beat the 3900X (or any TR4 3xxx chip) in anything except workloads relying heavily on AVX 512 and Photoshop / Premiere (because they're dinosauric piles of xxxx).

Those chips are running 100C at just 4.3Ghz and 360mm radiator to themselves. Trying to do 4.5Ghz let alone 5Ghz would be a challenge.

Also we see already that the 7920X is left behind already by the 3900X and in many cases the 9980XE also.

Here is a nice review using also 9980XE & 7920X.
https://hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-and-ryzen-7-3700x-zen-2-review?page=5

Now add 4 more cores to see where the 3950X would be against them. Even the 10980XE looks grim.

Grim5 · 4 Oct 2019 at 07:56

Intel Xe coming soon?

Raj posted this picture - it's a custom number plate on his Tesla - it says "THINKXE" along with a date embossed on the plate "Jun 2020"

https://imgur.com/a/6TDpwTO

sandys · 4 Oct 2019 at 09:11

Panos said:
Those chips are running 100C at just 4.3Ghz and 360mm radiator to themselves. Trying to do 4.5Ghz let alone 5Ghz would be a challenge.

Also we see already that the 7920X is left behind already by the 3900X and in many cases the 9980XE also.

Here is a nice review using also 9980XE & 7920X.
https://hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-and-ryzen-7-3700x-zen-2-review?page=5

Now add 4 more cores to see where the 3950X would be against them. Even the 10980XE looks grim.

I can't imagine Threadripper is going to fair much better, I am sure both with need decent water, so temps not an issue really.

StriderX · 4 Oct 2019 at 15:24

They actually thought these names were intelligent? What the hell are they thinking? I do hope this is the last we see of such ridiculous naming conventions. Clearly rattled.