• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Cannonlake, Cascade Lake, Ice Lake, Tiger Lake & Sapphire Rapid thread

4K8KW10 said:
Wrong. The problem is the quality of our governments and the rich people whose main interest lies in the digging the ground for oil, instead of looking at the sky for the sunlight...
Click to expand...
If you want to do your bit for the environment and reduce your carbon footprint, you could try turning your computer off and stop posting here.
 
LePhuronn said:
If you want to do your bit for the environment and reduce your carbon footprint, you could try turning your computer off and stop posting here.
Click to expand...

I prefer to put you in the ignore list where you belong.

Woodsta888 said:
Who buys/consumes all the products from oil?
Click to expand...

Who puts prohibitions on the use of photovoltaics/solar panels for domestic use?
You will be in my ignore list now too.

Toasty said:
2970wx can be had for under £900, was even £700 very briefly a while back.

Pretty sure AMD will put the new 24 core Threadripper at the 999 bracket to directly compete and destroy the 10980XE
Click to expand...

I think the 24-core TR 3000 will be at least £1199.99.
 
LePhuronn said:
If you want to do your bit for the environment and reduce your carbon footprint, you could try turning your computer off and stop posting here.
Click to expand...
Individual changes are nearly irrelevant when something like 10 companies contribute to 70% of the pollution. Large scale structural change is required, although I still try to be as efficient as makes sense in my own life.
 
We do need to reduce our impact on the environment, there is no doubt about that but the Extinction Rebellion way is insanity, even if you ignore the return to the stone age madness what do you think 7bn people living off the land is going to do to "Gaia", how long will the worlds forests last with 7bn of us foraging for wood to burn? And what Carbon impact will that have?

Recognising our effect on the climate is good and proper, by the same token we also have to recognise that our modern technology industrialised world is infact what is saving the planet form us. From there we can work it out.
 
DragonQ said:
Individual changes are nearly irrelevant when something like 10 companies contribute to 70% of the pollution. Large scale structural change is required, although I still try to be as efficient as makes sense in my own life.
Click to expand...

My power consumption when browsing the internet is negligible perhaps 20W, how much does Ryzen 5 2500U draw in almost idling mode and one LED notebook screen...
 
humbug said:
We do need to reduce our impact on the environment, there is no doubt about that but the Extinction Rebellion way is insanity, even if you ignore the return to the stone age madness what do you think 7bn people living off the land is going to do to "Gaia", how long will the worlds forests last with 7bn of us foraging for wood to burn? And what Carbon impact will that have?

Recognising our effect on the climate is good and proper, by the same token we also have to recognise that our modern technology industrialised world is infact what is saving the planet form us. From there we can work it out.
Click to expand...

Nuclear power is what’s needed. Lots of clean and safe nuclear power.
 
4K8KW10 said:
Who puts prohibitions on the use of photovoltaics/solar panels for domestic use?
You will be in my ignore list now too.
Click to expand...

But you said I was WRONG and then talked about oil.

4K8KW10 said:
Wrong. The problem is the quality of our governments and the rich people whose main interest lies in the digging the ground for oil, instead of looking at the sky for the sunlight...
Click to expand...
 
4K8KW10 said:
My power consumption when browsing the internet is negligible perhaps 20W, how much does Ryzen 5 2500U draw in almost idling mode and one LED notebook screen...
Click to expand...
You may have missed the point slightly. I doubt he’s concerned about the small power draw from your computer but rather that you use that negligible power draw to write mostly nonsense.

In short you wouldn’t be missed by many. :)

Any whoo I have solar panels and a battery to store it yey to me :p
 
jigger said:
Nuclear power is what’s needed. Lots of clean and safe nuclear power.
Click to expand...
Nuclear power is extremely clean. Unfortunately, the waste products are not. It is a better option than fossil fuels in lots of ways, but it cannot be the ultimate answer.

The ultimate answer is fewer 5.2 GHz Intel chips. :p
 
Power draw is irrelevant, sure less power means less need for production, but the fundamentals of our energy industry aren't going to change with people buying less power hungry chips, computers most of us need in the first place (for the most part they're in low power states anyway).

This is such a non-argument, stop it, i'd like to get back to bashing Intel.
 
4K8KW10 said:
Wrong. The problem is the quality of our governments and the rich people whose main interest lies in the digging the ground for oil, instead of looking at the sky for the sunlight...
Click to expand...
=XDC=FluphyBunny said:
Lol I have a few people on ignore and this thread is just hilarious. I am guessing the usual troll is posting his complete nonsense, annoying people, crying troll, then 'putting them on ignore' How did I do?

The idiot needs a long holiday.
Click to expand...


Bang on!
 
Doobedoo said:
You may have missed the point slightly. I doubt he’s concerned about the small power draw from your computer but rather that you use that negligible power draw to write mostly nonsense.

In short you wouldn’t be missed by many. :)
Click to expand...

I'd guess missed by none
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom