No Time To Die (now contains spoilers!) Ha

Caporegime
Joined
30 Jul 2013
Posts
28,907
was Craig a reboot? There were so many references to items and past memories. Hell, even in this film OHMSS references were rammed down our throats constantly.

Did you get the sense this Bond had been married before and lost a wife? That he dealt with Blofeld and Spectre before the penultimate movie?

Casino Royale establishes that he only made his first kills in the opening black and white sequence to become a '00' agent.

And QOS picks up almost immediately after casino Royale, with bond having put Mr White in the back of the Aston Martin DBS
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Sep 2007
Posts
15,660
Location
Limbo
Having watched Casino Royale again last week I have a bit more understanding of him not being totally over Vesper for so long, despite the romance being so brief and short. It's clearly shown he's cold and emotionless, treating women as 'disposable playthings' and his romantic feelings for Vesper are likely the first time be really felt any connection to anyone through his life. As such despite the short time together that has left a strong imprint on him and he can't easily shake it and the feeling he'll be betrayed if he falls in love again.

I, like many others watching No Time To Die was thinking god man, it's been years, get over it :D
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
3,687
Location
Sussex
I spent a while the other day talking about what happens next with my Son as far as the role James Bond is concerned. Its not like Doctor Who (its good for a start ;) ) in that the role is written to change, each time somebody new comes along playing James Bond although Craig did feel like a (well needed imho) reboot but now JB has been killed I'm not really sure what happens next.
We could just have another film with JB in it as he's just a character in a story and why can't you make more but then most when most anthers kill a character they are dead and that's it.

Hope they don't do prequels and wotnot! Maybe they will carry on the 007 role with a new named spy, possibly picking another name from the original books.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Nov 2021
Posts
265
Location
UK
Got a chance to see this; it was how would i say this not great but could be better if they added some common sense to the plot.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Sep 2005
Posts
16,553
I really enjoyed this. Thought the first half was better than the second though. Music and location was 10/10 as it the course with a bond film.
Negatives were the bad guy and the ending. I'm not saying rami malek was the wrong choice, I think the writing was just bad for him.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
14 Feb 2014
Posts
712
Enjoyed it immensely, the best of the Daniel Craig films and third in my top 3, just below my number 1 License to Kill, and 2 Live and let die.
 

wnb

wnb

Soldato
Joined
27 Feb 2004
Posts
3,983
Dissapointed in this movie, I was bored and wondering if it would ever end. Gob smacked that they killed off James Bond, I was looking forward to find out who the next James Bond would be.
 
Soldato
Joined
16 Jun 2005
Posts
24,030
Location
In the middle
Dissapointed in this movie, I was bored and wondering if it would ever end. Gob smacked that they killed off James Bond, I was looking forward to find out who the next James Bond would be.
Nah there'll be another Bond. I just see it as a code name to go with the 007 number.
Not seen it yet, but have pre ordered the dvd from Amazon, released on 20th Dec.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Jan 2015
Posts
4,968
Location
Consett
Nah there'll be another Bond. I just see it as a code name to go with the 007 number.
Not seen it yet, but have pre ordered the dvd from Amazon, released on 20th Dec.

Exactly how I've always seen it, his name is James Bond and his ID is 007. However before MI6 he's someone else, that's how I've always thought of it anyway.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Mar 2010
Posts
11,078
Location
Bucks
I think the word 'disappointed' sum this movie up really well. Uninteresting side characters, no-one really gets any decent screen time apart from Bond and I think there could have been some real good potential with the new 007, the eye guy, CIA girl, flipping Rami! (criminally underused)

The return of Blofeld in the Craig era has to be the biggest misstep the studio has done by far - They basically made him a joke and utterly useless.

I honestly don't really care who they get as the next Bond, but ones thing for sure is that they need better writers.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
9 Jul 2003
Posts
9,595
I spent a while the other day talking about what happens next with my Son as far as the role James Bond is concerned. Its not like Doctor Who (its good for a start ;) ) in that the role is written to change, each time somebody new comes along playing James Bond although Craig did feel like a (well needed imho) reboot but now JB has been killed I'm not really sure what happens next.
We could just have another film with JB in it as he's just a character in a story and why can't you make more but then most when most anthers kill a character they are dead and that's it.

Hope they don't do prequels and wotnot! Maybe they will carry on the 007 role with a new named spy, possibly picking another name from the original books.

My first thought was they are setting it up for his daughter to carry on the family name but I bet that would have bond fans in outrage :cry:

I thought the film was pretty average really. I didn't hate it but I don't think it flowed as well as other bond films, the music seemed a bit off as well.
I'd give it 6/10 but when it ended it was all a bit... "meh".
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,166
As a Bond movie it is quite lacking as an action movie it was for the most part fairly decent but it didn't really go anywhere and the ending I dunno just felt unnecessary. I mostly enjoyed it to be fair but it left me missing a proper Bond movie.

I'm not saying rami malek was the wrong choice, I think the writing was just bad for him.

Yeah never really given much room or time to truly develop despite the length of the movie.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Mar 2006
Posts
8,336
The fact that they killed off SPECTRE and then Bond himself just feels like a studio making a film they didn't really know what to do with anymore and a franchicse they want to totally reinvent. It had some great set pieces looked stunning in places some of the action was great, but then there were just horribly jarring and childish moments that were aweful. It thew far far to many elements in there that just sprang out of nowhere.


I would like the whole franchise to split now if need be. One would remake all of the Fleming books set in the Cold War and be completely faithful to the original idea, it would be grown up, charming, measured and involve old school spying. The other can be set in the present and continue with computer geek Q and all the silliness, like the Marvel franchise but with a cast of multicultural 00 agents.

This middle ground after Casino Royale just doesn't seem to work.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Posts
10,719
I was enormously underwhelmed by the villians.

Also expected a far darker and sadistic ending than saying goodbye over the phone.

Like so:

So we have the disposable bad guy get into a gunfight with bond and predictably die but obviously wound bond badly. Before the bad guy dies he grabs at the stuffed rabbit and talks some trash.

Bond opens the blast doors and finds a boat to struggle away from the island to Madeline and child.

Big emotional reuniting. Bond still bleeding away like he's packing 50 litres of ribena.

Child comes to get the rabbit off him. The missiles start flying over.

He holds Madeline.

There's a suspicious silence and the crunch of glass.

Half the broken vial falls out of the rabbit.

Bond sees them die before him and screams holding them as the missiles obliterate the island in the background.

Film ends with some kind of artistic display of them dead and him questionably dead and not moving.

Start playing that all the time in the world music but no vocals and extra violins.

It could have emotionally traumatised millions of people and they wasted the opportunity!
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Posts
24,136
Location
Lorville - Hurston
I was enormously underwhelmed by the villians.

Also expected a far darker and sadistic ending than saying goodbye over the phone.

Like so:

So we have the disposable bad guy get into a gunfight with bond and predictably die but obviously wound bond badly. Before the bad guy dies he grabs at the stuffed rabbit and talks some trash.

Bond opens the blast doors and finds a boat to struggle away from the island to Madeline and child.

Big emotional reuniting. Bond still bleeding away like he's packing 50 litres of ribena.

Child comes to get the rabbit off him. The missiles start flying over.

He holds Madeline.

There's a suspicious silence and the crunch of glass.

Half the broken vial falls out of the rabbit.

Bond sees them die before him and screams holding them as the missiles obliterate the island in the background.

Film ends with some kind of artistic display of them dead and him questionably dead and not moving.

Start playing that all the time in the world music but no vocals and extra violins.

It could have emotionally traumatised millions of people and they wasted the opportunity!
haha true
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Sep 2007
Posts
15,660
Location
Limbo
It could have emotionally traumatised millions of people and they wasted the opportunity!

Last two movies have been a textbook example of wasted opportunity :( When you've got actors as good as Waltz and Malek and write such under utilized parts for them there is something very wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom