The GTX Titan X owners thread.

andrewohare · 26 Mar 2015 at 14:58

snips86x said:
Looks really nice but lonely

will get another one in a month or so... bank account needs to recover

crinkleshoes · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:00

magpie1966 said:
no video output from either titan x's Ive tried both cards singular, can't even see the post screen. used working cable tried all ports. it's got to be something daft. the system boots into windows I can hear the chime. help ! anyone ?

Have you tried the DVI or VGA output from the motherboard itself?

Have you done a CMOS (bios) reset?

Gregster · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:01

Right lads, all onto Valley bench run please. Let's tear that up

Born_2_Kill_83 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:07

****ing lovin this card, it's blitzing my CF290X setup with a little overclocking, pulling around 5/10 more average FPS in BFH @ 4K now, average 80FPS.

She's in.......

Boomstick777 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:11

andrewohare said:
Just Ran Shadow of Mordor and it was smooth at 100fps+ only dropped to 80s when a lot of orcs were on screen

Runs beautifully @ 1440P, puts the GTX 980 to shame

That extra vram is loverly

seth1969 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:11

Oh dear got one waiting at home, roll on 5.30
Gone back to being a 45 year old kid

seth1969 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:15

Will my Xeon 5650@ 4ghz be ok with the titian x ?

fantasticCG · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:16

seth1969 said:
Oh dear got one waiting at home, roll on 5.30
Gone back to being a 45 year old kid

Good work!!! Always a 31 year old kid

VincentHanna · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:21

Well OCUK wouldn't price match, so (sadly) I ordered from elsewhere.

Won't mention where but 2x MSI Titan X's will be winging their way to me by Monday next week.

Turns out I'm a hypocrite

Born_2_Kill_83 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:21

Think I have a stable benching and gaming O/C.

1238 Base Core
1312 Boost hitting 1400mhz in games.

Well happy with that, what's every-one else gaming stable at?

Bonjour · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:24

Born_2_Kill_83 said:
****ing lovin this card, it's blitzing my CF290X setup with a little overclocking, pulling around 5/10 more average FPS in BFH @ 4K now, average 80FPS.

She's in.......

You would have the same case as me, wouldn't you. Just when I'd made my mind up not to get one...

It looks awesome in the H440.

LambChop · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:24

VincentHanna said:
Well OCUK wouldn't price match, so (sadly) I ordered from elsewhere.

Won't mention where but 2x MSI Titan X's will be winging their way to me by Monday next week.

Turns out I'm a hypocrite

Wouldnt price match me either.

Born_2_Kill_83 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:27

Bonjour said:
You would have the same case as me, wouldn't you. Just when I'd made my mind up not to get one...

It looks awesome in the H440.

The only thing I think it's missing is a 2nd card tbh.

This is the most expensive single card I've ever bought but I think it's worth every pound.

magpie1966 · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:33

panic over, had to change output to pci e, and turn off onboard video. in bios.

andrewohare · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:33

Boomstick777 said:
Runs beautifully @ 1440P, puts the GTX 980 to shame That extra vram is loverly

Run the following games that were notorious for Vram usage

Shadow of Mordor - used to lag in heavy fights and Executions
Dying light - lagged when grabbed by zombies
Dragon age Inquisition - was a mess SLI

all ran beautifully no lag and not one drop below 70fps

I didn't think the card was noisy but I have my PC running through a sony 810 amp with proper 5:1 speakers so can t hear anything during gaming

Looks like that 12GB memory was a winner

so do I need a 2nd card .. nope
do I want a 2nd card - HELL yes!!

chroniclard · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:33

Safe to assume one of these watercooled would be epic?

VincentHanna · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:34

The Dying Light 'lag when grabbed' problem wasn't GPU related and was patched out within a few days of the games release.

I think it was something to do with using too much system RAM.

Gregster · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:34

I just ran the SoM bench with everything maxed at 1440P and...............It's Beautifully smooth

VincentHanna · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:35

SOM Benchmark never did use more than 4GB VRAM even with Ultra textures. Not sure if the developers cleverly planned the benchmark route or just a coincidence.

It was in-game when the problem became apparent, particularly on the 2nd area of the game.

A bit like how the GTA IV benchmark was never indicative of in-game performance.

llamadal · 26 Mar 2015 at 15:35

oh ffs must resist!

Competitor rules

The GTX Titan X owners thread.

Mobster