NUCLEARUS BENCHMARK :)

MisterT · 13 Jun 2007 at 08:44

Street said:
Well I'm finally back up and running with my new board after this test killed my P5B! Here are my results from my P5B...

I haven't got around to overclocking with this new P35 board yet but hopefully it should be just as good!

Time to challenge for the best dual core.. Without destroying my board this time!

please tell us how that p35 goes, im randy for another upgrade and the board might be it, cheers bro.

Amonlym · 13 Jun 2007 at 08:56

it was late night and i was feeling silly, not worried about getting an official score on the board for lappy

maddness · 13 Jun 2007 at 11:56

edit: n/m i noticed it was 1.0

Modjo · 13 Jun 2007 at 19:39

NuclearRus Benchmark

Hope this info is ok. Think I can o/c more but I'm scared! :eek:

Street · 13 Jun 2007 at 20:12

MisterT said:
please tell us how that p35 goes, im randy for another upgrade and the board might be it, cheers bro.

So far it seems just as stable as my P5B if not more.. Took me a while to figure out the BIOS. Didn't find it as easy to work with as the Asus BIOS. However, I now need a lot less volts on my CPU to reach the same overclock!

Before I had to run 1.475v at least to reach 3.6GHz. Now I am running at 1.4v to reach it. Haven't tried to push it yet.. Going to wait till the weekend before I try and kill this board.

MisterT · 13 Jun 2007 at 20:50

Street said:
So far it seems just as stable as my P5B if not more.. Took me a while to figure out the BIOS. Didn't find it as easy to work with as the Asus BIOS. However, I now need a lot less volts on my CPU to reach the same overclock!

Before I had to run 1.475v at least to reach 3.6GHz. Now I am running at 1.4v to reach it. Haven't tried to push it yet.. Going to wait till the weekend before I try and kill this board.

lol yeah might as well get some normal'ish use out of it before frying it

sure itll be ok

keep us informed m8 , thanks

SOLDNER-MOFO64 · 15 Jun 2007 at 14:21

all updated....thanx guys

Black Dragon · 15 Jun 2007 at 14:56

Here's mine but how accurate is this test? It doesn't even read the CPU speed properly as you can see from my screeny. The Cpu-z speed is the same as reported in the bios and every other program i have.

[edit] ignore that, i just updated from F10bios to F12 and now nuclearis gives the same readings as cpu-z etc

eracer2006 · 15 Jun 2007 at 15:17

e6300 at 2.8ghz

Vipernet · 15 Jun 2007 at 16:18

e6420 @ 2.8 on a micro-atx fatality mobo. Chip will do better but think my mobo is maxxed out totally.

Gotta be a pretty high score for a micro-atx machine yeh?

Modjo · 15 Jun 2007 at 19:23

I've managed to squeeze a bit more out with the help of one of your mambers (Thanks El Jimben!!

) Here's a new score

vapor matt · 15 Jun 2007 at 20:15

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n241/vapor_matt/nucbenchmark.jpg[/IMG]]

heres my score! the P35 does do well in this. 18439

steve258 · 15 Jun 2007 at 20:33

I believe we have a new record here

Tom|Nbk · 15 Jun 2007 at 23:17

Jokester · 15 Jun 2007 at 23:30

Jokester

w3bbo · 16 Jun 2007 at 00:07

I so need a quad

manoz · 16 Jun 2007 at 00:27

Would be interesting to see what Barcelona does when it comes out.

Troop · 16 Jun 2007 at 00:52

w3bbo said:
I so need a quad

July the 21st will soon be here

Townlea · 16 Jun 2007 at 00:57

Should slot in nicely!

499x8 = 3992mhz

Memory - 5-5-5-15 998mhz

lay-z-boy · 16 Jun 2007 at 01:18

Bah, will have to push my x3210 through the roof soonish

I win the cheapest quad oc though