• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OZONE 3D SOFT SHADOWS BENCH

Yeah Sapphire X1950XT 256MB.

Gimme a sec.. i will just put the settings to 621/900 (default) and retest as I just reinstalled the drivers.

RESULTS:
2401 @ 500/594 (standard in bios BEFORE overdrive settings)
2928 @ 621/900 (the rated standard 3D settings for the card).

Paracelsus
Your score makes me wonder whether you are running at 500/594 by mistake? My overclock to 702/1044 only gets it to 3346, so really it isn't that much difference, only just over 400 points (fps?).

Matthew
 
Last edited:
3392 with a 8800GTX 626|2000 and Vista :( - This benchie doesnt appear to like Vista

tbpm5.png


TBH im not liking Vista either at the mo and prolly going back to XP in the next week or so - ill see how that fairs :)
 
softshadows_radeon_x1950xtx_c7.6_branch_on.jpg


GIGABYTE Radeon X1950XTX 512Mb default clocks - Catalyst 7.6
msi k9n sli / AMD X2 3800+ default clocks / 2 x 1024Mb DDR2 400 Corsair
 
softshadows_gf8800gtx_f162.18_branch_on.jpg


NVIDIA 8800 GTX 768Mb default clocks - Forceware 162.18 beta
msi k9n sli / AMD X2 3800+ default clocks / 2 x 1024Mb DDR2 400 Corsair
 
I ran this the other day with my x1950xt on my old CRT monitor and can't remember what score I got. I tried today on a widescreen 19" lcd and it can't support the default resolution, sigh...

Same goes with 3dmark06. I somehow knew settling for a max resolution of 1440x900 would come back and haunt me :)
 
The nearest telly it would work with is across the other side of the house and I can't be arsed lugging my case through there or the telly in here, just for the sake of benchmarking :)

And yes, that is me posting in the other thread you mention. I'd say with that score of 3346 that you definitely have an x1950xt!
 
Nullvoid said:
I ran this the other day with my x1950xt on my old CRT monitor and can't remember what score I got. I tried today on a widescreen 19" lcd and it can't support the default resolution, sigh...

Same goes with 3dmark06. I somehow knew settling for a max resolution of 1440x900 would come back and haunt me :)
Click to expand...


:confused: I run numerous benchmarks and I don’t seem to suffer any problems running 1440X900
 
softshadows_gf8800gtx_f97.94_branch_on.jpg


NVIDIA 8800 GTX 768Mb default clocks - Forceware 97.94
msi k9n sli / AMD X2 3800+ default clocks / 2 x 1024Mb DDR2 400 Corsair

Seems nvidia has added a gpu-cycle-eater in their latest drivers (fw162.18 - 3502 o3Marks) in comparison with fw97.94 (5470 o3Marks) :D
 
Nullvoid said:
Oh don't get me wrong, I can run 3dmark06 fine, just the results won't exactly be meaningful for comparisons with other people's systems.
Click to expand...

Then run all benchmarks on default settings take 3dmark06 for example it will physically change the res to its default settings when you run the benchmark, if you get what I mean, the same with others.

Edit/ ignore me :p I get what you mean with you CRT & the TFT
 
Scougar said:
Yeah Sapphire X1950XT 256MB.

Gimme a sec.. i will just put the settings to 621/900 (default) and retest as I just reinstalled the drivers.

RESULTS:
2401 @ 500/594 (standard in bios BEFORE overdrive settings)
2928 @ 621/900 (the rated standard 3D settings for the card).

Paracelsus
Your score makes me wonder whether you are running at 500/594 by mistake? My overclock to 702/1044 only gets it to 3346, so really it isn't that much difference, only just over 400 points (fps?).

Matthew
Click to expand...

I was wondering that too, as I only got 4200 in 3DMark06 which is similiar to my friend's 1950GT. But I have monitored the clock speeds when running games and they do indeed ramp up to 621/1800. Was about to try monitoring them while running this benchmark but now it's decided not to run at all. Hmm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom