Were we really as bad as it seems?
Haven't managed to see/listen to anything because I have been away. Hopefully (or not, as the case may be) I'll grab something online. Were we really as bad as it seems?
Haven't managed to see/listen to anything because I have been away. Hopefully (or not, as the case may be) I'll grab something online. Were we really as bad as it seems?
- England's first innings: all out for 102
- Australia's first innings: all out for 445
- England's second innings: currently at 5 for 82
Let's just say there's room for improvement.
Thanks for the bullet points. I'm guessing you work in marketing![]()
I got the scores, just missing the actual "ball-by-ball", as it were![]()
Judging by the responses; I'll get drunk before I watch the highlights![]()
Haven't managed to see/listen to anything because I have been away. Hopefully (or not, as the case may be) I'll grab something online. Were we really as bad as it seems?
Spawn has piped up again, when England were on top he was nowhere to be seen?
Awful 4th test buts an English collapse is tradition but in 2 innings, this is the best we have to offer from the country?
Meh not overly bothered, it's 1-1 and everything to play for at the Oval - ask any Englishman if they would take that scoreline going into the final Test at the start of the series and they'd be pretty happy.
http://www.cricinfo.com/engvaus2009/content/current/story/418523.htmlFor the first time in 121 years, England's Nos. 3, 4 and 5 were all dismissed in single figures in both innings of a Test