You mean 181 for 4
Never understood why the Aussies express the batting side's score wickets first, it defies logic but never mind
2009 Ashes Series - England vs. Australia **Spoilers**
- Thread starter oli collett
- Start date
Never understood why the Aussies express the batting side's score wickets first, it defies logic but never mind
What a ripper from Siddle and he get's 4 extras for it !
Siddle has bowled well, Johnson has had a few good overs, but pretty average stuff from the Aus bowlers and really England should be stamping down their authority on this game but haven't. I think KP would've enjoyed this today.
Can't help but feel the Aussies are going to rue not picking Lee, I think he would've been through the English batting line-up by now
Siddle has bowled well, Johnson has had a few good overs, but pretty average stuff from the Aus bowlers and really England should be stamping down their authority on this game but haven't. I think KP would've enjoyed this today.
Can't help but feel the Aussies are going to rue not picking Lee, I think he would've been through the English batting line-up by now
Never understood why the Aussies express the batting side's score wickets first, it defies logic but never mind
Because they're backwards of course
.Good to see the 200 up; slow scoring it may be but at least Trott is sounding comfortable.
Never understood why the Aussies express the batting side's score wickets first, it defies logic but never mind
We only do it because we know it winds up the Poms.
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,793
- Location
- London
Prior 
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,793
- Location
- London
I'd still look for 400.
Associate
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,186
- Location
- Northampton
350 - 380 depending on another good partnership
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,793
- Location
- London
Probably looking at 280 now Fred's gone!
Dont say that. The next few are Englands top order!
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,793
- Location
- London
trott gone. oh dear.
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,793
- Location
- London
If Swann bowls well, we'll only need 300 by the way this pitch is going.
He did well for his first ever Test innings
Perhaps, but did he do well enough for an Ashes Test...?