Poll: *** 2010 General Election Result & Discussion ***

Who did you vote for?

  • Labour

    Votes: 137 13.9%
  • Conservative

    Votes: 378 38.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 304 30.9%
  • UK Independence Party

    Votes: 27 2.7%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 10 1.0%
  • British National Party

    Votes: 20 2.0%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • DUP

    Votes: 4 0.4%
  • UUP

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 3 0.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 16 1.6%
  • Abstain

    Votes: 80 8.1%

  • Total voters
    985
  • Poll closed .
Socialists angers me sometimes, inheritance tax is the main area they expose themselves as selfish and jealous :mad:

I wont even inherit an estate that will trigger inheritance tax, and I still think it's a joke.

20 years ago my family wouldn't have been either however the days of buying a house for £20k are loooong gone...:p

EDIT: Looking at the list of secretaries, most look pretty good, a nice number of people that have prior experience in their posts, especially those to do with money. :)
 
Last edited:
Why not give this coalition the benefit of the doubt and let them get on with it ?

Those who are screaming Tory scum might want to do the same.

Barring a collapse, we have this arrangement for 5 years so let's see what they can do.
 
Why not give this coalition the benefit of the doubt and let them get on with it ?

Those who are screaming Tory scum might want to do the same.

Barring a collapse, we have this arrangement for 5 years so let's see what they can do.
That's far too sensible an answer, Von. Far too sensible :p
 
I'm fairly optimistic about this, I had voted for the Lib Dems hoping we'd get 70-80 seats this time and have quite a bit of weight in negotiating policies in a coalition government. Nick Clegg and others have done fantastically with what the electorate gave them.

My wife started crying when Gordon Brown blamed himself in his speech yesterday, apparently she started crying when John Major resigned too. :eek:
 
Last edited:
That's far too sensible an answer, Von. Far too sensible :p

Maybe DJ, maybe. ;)

Some of those shouting Tory scum at William Hague yesterday must have been all of Power Rangers age when the last Tory government was in power.

I have no issue with demonstration and indeed welcome it but at least know what you are speaking out against.

The ' What do we want ..... I don't know. When do we want it ? Now ' brigade do get on my nerves sometimes.
 
I have a couple of friends like that and their reason for hating the conservatives is Thatcher, which is odd considering I'm not even sure they were born when she was in power... However their parents are staunch labour supporters so...
 
I can't help but wonder if the next five years is actually going to be a continuation of the joint stand up show we just got treated to today...I can think of worse forms of government though...
 
Why not give this coalition the benefit of the doubt and let them get on with it ?

Those who are screaming Tory scum might want to do the same.

Barring a collapse, we have this arrangement for 5 years so let's see what they can do.

Indeed. Votes have been cast, decisions have been made; time to accept what is and hope for the best. Crying foul will do nothing to improve the sitation.
 
I can't help but wonder if the next five years is actually going to be a continuation of the joint stand up show we just got treated to today...I can think of worse forms of government though...

Which is why I give the benefit of the doubt.

Amp34 said:
I have a couple of friends like that and their reason for hating the conservatives is Thatcher, which is odd considering I'm not even sure they were born when she was in power... However their parents are staunch labour supporters so...

An attitude which astounds me as Margaret Thatcher was ousted 20 years ago. Even more astounding is when they weren't born when she was in power.

Surely her parents remember the Labour government that was voted out in 1979 when Britain was on it's knees and in utter chaos ? Even your most staunch Labour supporter can't deny that.
 
Surely her parents remember the Labour government that was voted out in 1979 when Britain was on it's knees and in utter chaos ? Even your most staunch Labour supporter can't deny that.
And even your most staunch Tory cannot deny that Anthony Barber actually apologised to Dennis Healey for leaving the economy in 'such a mess', when Healey took office in '74.
 
This is somethig we all should read:

Conservative-Lib Dem deal

Here is the full text of the coalition agreement reached by the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats:

This document sets out agreements reached between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats on a range of issues. These are the issues that needed to be resolved between us in order for us to work together as a strong and stable government. It will be followed in due course by a final Coalition Agreement, covering the full range of policy and including foreign, defence and domestic policy issues not covered in this document.

1. Deficit Reduction

The parties agree that deficit reduction and continuing to ensure economic recovery is the most urgent issue facing Britain. We have therefore agreed that there will need to be:


•a significantly accelerated reduction in the structural deficit over the course of a Parliament, with the main burden of deficit reduction borne by reduced spending rather than increased taxes;


•arrangements that will protect those on low incomes from the effect of public sector pay constraint and other spending constraints; and protection of jobs by stopping Labour's proposed jobs tax.
The parties agree that a plan for deficit reduction should be set out in an emergency budget within 50 days of the signing of any agreement; the parties note that the credibility of a plan on deficit reduction depends on its long-term deliverability, not just the depth of immediate cuts. New forecasts of growth and borrowing should be made by an independent Office for Budget Responsibility for this emergency budget.

The parties agree that modest cuts of £6 billion to non-front line services can be made within the financial year 2010-11, subject to advice from the Treasury and the Bank of England on their feasibility and advisability. Some proportion of these savings can be used to support jobs, for example through the cancelling of some backdated demands for business rates. Other policies upon which we are agreed will further support job creation and green investment, such as work programmes for the unemployed and a green deal for energy efficiency investment.

The parties agree that reductions can be made to the Child Trust Fund and tax credits for higher earners.

2. Spending Review - NHS, Schools and a Fairer Society

The parties agree that a full Spending Review should be held, reporting this Autumn, following a fully consultative process involving all tiers of government and the private sector.

The parties agree that funding for the NHS should increase in real terms in each year of the Parliament, while recognising the impact this decision would have on other departments. The target of spending 0.7% of GNI on overseas aid will also remain in place.

We will fund a significant premium for disadvantaged pupils from outside the schools budget by reductions in spending elsewhere.

The parties commit to holding a full Strategic Security and Defence Review alongside the Spending Review with strong involvement of the Treasury.

The Government will be committed to the maintenance of Britain's nuclear deterrent, and have agreed that the renewal of Trident should be scrutinised to ensure value for money. Liberal Democrats will continue to make the case for alternatives. We will immediately play a strong role in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference, and press for continued progress on multilateral disarmament.

The parties commit to establishing an independent commission to review the long term affordability of public sector pensions, while protecting accrued rights.

We will restore the earnings link for the basic state pension from April 2011 with a "triple guarantee" that pensions are raised by the higher of earnings, prices or 2.5%, as proposed by the Liberal Democrats.

3. Tax Measures

The parties agree that the personal allowance for income tax should be increased in order to help lower and middle income earners. We agree to announce in the first Budget a substantial increase in the personal allowance from April 2011, with the benefits focused on those with lower and middle incomes. This will be funded with the money that would have been used to pay for the increase in Employee National Insurance thresholds proposed by the Conservatives, as well as revenues from increases in Capital Gains Tax rates for non-business assets as described below. The increase in Employer National Insurance thresholds proposed by the Conservatives will go ahead in order to stop Labour's jobs tax. We also agree to a longer term policy objective of further increasing the personal allowance to £10,000, making further real terms steps each year towards this objective.

We agree that this should take priority over other tax cuts, including cuts to Inheritance Tax. We also agree that provision will be made for Liberal Democrat MPs to abstain on budget resolutions to introduce transferable tax allowances for married couples without prejudice to this coalition agreement.

The parties agree that a switch should be made to a per-plane, rather than per-passenger duty; a proportion of any increased revenues over time will be used to help fund increases in the personal allowance.

We further agree to seek a detailed agreement on taxing non-business capital gains at rates similar or close to those applied to income, with generous exemptions for entrepreneurial business activities.

The parties agree that tackling tax avoidance is essential for the new government, and that all efforts will be made to do so, including detailed development of Liberal Democrat proposals.

4. Banking Reform

The parties agree that reform to the banking system is essential to avoid a repeat of Labour's financial crisis, to promote a competitive economy, to sustain the recovery and to protect and sustain jobs.

We agree that a banking levy will be introduced. We will seek a detailed agreement on implementation.

We agree to bring forward detailed proposals for robust action to tackle unacceptable bonuses in the financial services sector; in developing these proposals, we will ensure they are effective in reducing risk.

We agree to bring forward detailed proposals to foster diversity, promote mutuals and create a more competitive banking industry.

We agree that ensuring the flow of credit to viable SMEs is essential for supporting growth and should be a core priority for a new government, and we will work together to develop effective proposals to do so. This will include consideration of both a major loan guarantee scheme and the use of net lending targets for the nationalised banks.

The parties wish to reduce systemic risk in the banking system and will establish an independent commission to investigate the complex issue of separating retail and investment banking in a sustainable way; while recognising that this would take time to get right, the commission will be given an initial time frame of one year to report.

The parties agree that the regulatory system needs reform to avoid a repeat of Labour's financial crisis. We agree to bring forward proposals to give the Bank of England control of macro-prudential regulation and oversight of micro-prudential regulation.

The parties also agree to rule out joining the European Single Currency during the duration of this agreement.
 
Last edited:
What people who hate Thatcher fail to realise is that she took over this country when it was in utter chaos and turned it around for the better.

Yes people lost their jobs but what do they expect when the economy was totally unproductive.
 
What a nonsense argument.
Actually I think it's a very parallel argument. You seem to be basing your criticism on being born into money. Yet a child born in the U.K. has infinitely more hope of being healthy, having a job, higher standard of living etc. than one born in Nigeria. People benefit from their history in every corner of the world; it's just part of human nature. Surely without the desire to improve and be successful there would be no innovation, no job creation and we would all plod along stacking shelves. Inheritance tax not only effects middle of the road earners but it appears to be justified on some strange socialist agenda whereby being successful and aiming for the best is punished. What do you think would be the outcome of say a £50k inheritance tax free allowance? Do you not think it would encourage people to fritter away their cash at the same time as lowering motivation and drive?
 
Continued:

5. Immigration

We have agreed that there should be an annual limit on the number of non-EU economic migrants admitted into the UK to live and work. We will consider jointly the mechanism for implementing the limit. We will end the detention of children for immigration purposes.

6. Political Reform

The parties agree to the establishment of five year fixed-term parliaments. A Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government will put a binding motion before the House of Commons in the first days following this agreement stating that the next general election will be held on the first Thursday of May 2015. Following this motion, legislation will be brought forward to make provision for fixed term parliaments of five years. This legislation will also provide for dissolution if 55% or more of the House votes in favour.

The parties will bring forward a Referendum Bill on electoral reform, which includes provision for the introduction of the Alternative Vote in the event of a positive result in the referendum, as well as for the creation of fewer and more equal sized constituencies. Both parties will whip their Parliamentary Parties in both Houses to support a simple majority referendum on the Alternative Vote, without prejudice to the positions parties will take during such a referendum.

The parties will bring forward early legislation to introduce a power of recall, allowing voters to force a by-election where an MP was found to have engaged in serious wrongdoing and having had a petition calling for a by-election signed by 10% of his or her constituents.

We agree to establish a committee to bring forward proposals for a wholly or mainly elected upper chamber on the basis of proportional representation. The committee will come forward with a draft motions by December 2010. It is likely that this bill will advocate single long terms of office. It is also likely there will be a grandfathering system for current Peers. In the interim, Lords appointments will be made with the objective of creating a second chamber reflective of the share of the vote secured by the political parties in the last general election.

The parties will bring forward the proposals of the Wright Committee for reform to the House of Commons in full - starting with the proposed committee for management of programmed business and including government business within its scope by the third year of the Parliament.

The parties agree to reduce electoral fraud by speeding up the implementation of individual voter registration.

We have agreed to establish a commission to consider the 'West Lothian question'.

The parties agree to the implementation of the Calman Commission proposals and the offer of a referendum on further Welsh devolution.

The parties will tackle lobbying through introducing a statutory register of lobbyists. We also agree to pursue a detailed agreement on limiting donations and reforming party funding in order to remove big money from politics.

The parties will promote the radical devolution of power and greater financial autonomy to local government and community groups. This will include a full review of local government finance.

7. Pensions and Welfare

The parties agree to phase out the default retirement age and hold a review to set the date at which the state pension age starts to rise to 66, although it will not be sooner than 2016 for men and 2020 for women. We agree to end the rules requiring compulsory annuitisation at 75.

We agree to implement the Parliamentary and Health Ombudsman's recommendation to make fair and transparent payments to Equitable Life policy holders, through an independent payment scheme, for their relative loss as a consequence of regulatory failure.

The parties agree to end all existing welfare to work programmes and to create a single welfare to work programme to help all unemployed people get back into work.

We agree that Jobseeker's Allowance claimants facing the most significant barriers to work should be referred to the aforementioned newly created welfare to work programme immediately, not after 12 months as is currently the case. We agree that Jobseeker's Allowance claimants aged under 25 should be referred to the programme after a maximum of six months.

The parties agree to realign contracts with welfare to work service providers to reflect more closely the results they achieve in getting people back into work.

We agree that the funding mechanism used by government to finance welfare to work programmes should be reformed to reflect the fact that initial investment delivers later savings in lower benefit expenditure.

We agree that receipt of benefits for those able to work should be conditional on the willingness to work.

8. Education

Schools

We agree to promote the reform of schools in order to ensure:


•that new providers can enter the state school system in response to parental demand;


•that all schools have greater freedom over curriculum;


•and, that all schools are held properly accountable.

Higher education

We await Lord Browne's final report into higher education funding, and will judge its proposals against the need to:


•increase social mobility;


•take into account the impact on student debt;


•ensure a properly funded university sector;


•improve the quality of teaching;


•advance scholarship;


•and, attract a higher proportion of students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

If the response of the Government to Lord Browne's report is one that Liberal Democrats cannot accept, then arrangements will be made to enable Liberal Democrat MPs to abstain in any vote.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom