30/11 Strikes.

That map is a farce. The convervatives were NOT Elected or have you forgotten. No party was elected outright, and yet we have a CON kangaroo government

HAHAHAHA oh my god 'reform and do it over a long time!!!' Have you been making hats again? :p:p:p

A couple of points, firstly we have a coalition of two parties that between them, commanded approx 60% of the vote.

Secondly the conservatives got a greater proportion of the vote than Blair did in 2005, and Labour got a worse share of the vote than Major did in 1997, but due to gerrymandered constituencies, the Conservatives require about 8% greater vote compared to Labour to gain a parliamentary majority.

Was the labour government of 2005 unelected due to getting a lower percentage of the vote than the Tories did this time around?
 
That map is a farce. The convervatives were NOT Elected or have you forgotten. No party was elected outright, and yet we have a CON kangaroo government

HAHAHAHA oh my god 'reform and do it over a long time!!!' Have you been making hats again? :p:p:p

It is a completely accurate reflection of the election. Perhaps you are forgetting that we do not elect governments - we elect representatives of our constituencies who go on to form a government.

kJLgL.png
 
They were not elected outright due to stupid and outdated methods, that map is clearly over 50% blue, so by logic would indicate they have more say.

Stop being bitter about the electons

Im not effected by this strike as im not at uni on wednesday, instead i have a nice 6 hour shift to enjoy where people will end up buying things making me earn a decent wage

The map is a complete farce and it is what got the cons elected. Proportional Representation would have produced a completely different picture.
 
the strikes were announced ages ago - plenty of time to make alternative arrangements.

Gambling on the schoold being open or not is stupid imo.

Nonsense, the school informed us of it's alternative arrangements last week, which meant many people who could have, or did make arrangements did not do so, changed them due to what they were told....(and repeated on Friday)

This afternoon that has changed, because more staff, who were presumably intending on attending on wednesday have subsequently decided otherwise.

Don't presume people are stupid because they are following instructions given them by the institutions involved, it is not unreasonable to expect the individual to give reasonable notice of their intentions.

This is the difference between illiciting public support or not, and unreasonable behaviour does not persuade me as to their overall intentions....it increasingly seems that the objective is to be as awkward and disruptive as possible and this is becoming less about contracts and more about politics.....
 
Last edited:
If you pay tax and more importantly if you will be paying tax for 20 years or more from now, you should be glad that action is being taken now to revise pensions.

It is your money that will be used to pay for them.

You also have to add the proposed flat rate state pension which will enhance the benefits for anyone with a contributory pension scheme.
 
It doesn't take a genius to work out the vast majority of schools will be closed and make appropriate arrangements.

The school informed him that it would be open what is so hard to understand about that. It doesn't take a genius to work out the vast majority of politicians will not give you what they promise when it comes to public pensions and make alternative arrangements!
 
Last edited:
It is a completely accurate reflection of the election. Perhaps you are forgetting that we do not elect governments - we elect representatives of our constituencies who go on to form a government.

kJLgL.png


See the problem with your little table - the far right column - votes garnered does NOT equal seats taken....FARCE
 
Hi Dolph,

Yes i'm aware.

Good, so you're happy that the link to earnings was introduced by Barbara Castle as a cost saving measure because earnings increases were lower than inflation at the time.

Glad we got that cleared up.

incidentally, you do realise it has been the coalition, via the Triple lock, not Labour, who restored the earnings link?
 
Originally Posted by quickshot89
They were not elected outright due to stupid and outdated methods, that map is clearly over 50% blue, so by logic would indicate they have more say.

The last time I checked voters were actual people, not innate tracts of land.
 
but anyway, not to derail the thread, that is a different discussion.

The point is, this current bunch of incapable fools is wrecking the economy even faster than Thatcher and her ilk... The next couple of years are going to get far worse and I can't see the situation improving untill radical and immediate reforms take place within our financial sector
 
See the problem with your little table - the far right column - votes garnered does NOT equal seats taken....FARCE

PR wouldn't have changed the makeup of government unless you're advocating that the Lib Dems ignore the will of the public and make a coalition of losers, against what they promised prior to the election?
 
The school informed him that it would be open what is so hard to understand about that. It doesn't take a genius to work out the vast majority of politicians will not give you what they promise when it comes to public pensions and make alternative arrangements!

Indeed!!!


If I relied only on my employer for my pension instead of taking some personal responsibility then I would be stupid...but hey ho I must be both stupid and incompetent at my job because I trusted people in authority at their word.....
 
but anyway, not to derail the thread, that is a different discussion.

The point is, this current bunch of incapable fools is wrecking the economy even faster than Thatcher and her ilk... The next couple of years are going to get far worse and I can't see the situation improving untill radical and immediate reforms take place within our financial sector

That would be the financial sector ruined by Labour's terrible regulatory changes, which led to consequences in turn made worse by Labour's fiscally incontinent public spending spending?
 
The strikes were announced ages ago - plenty of time to make alternative arrangements.

Gambling on the school being open or not is stupid imo - if I made planning decisions in that manner in my job I'd get the sack.


The intention to strike was not announced till last minute as possible, to cause as much disruption as possible.

Well according to the missus and her Union rep
 
My grandmother goes into hospital tomorrow for a tumour removal and at least one week's worth of recovery treatment that she's been waiting for for months.

Apparently some nurses/surgeons/etc. will be striking tomorrow.

**** them.
 
PR wouldn't have changed the makeup of government unless you're advocating that the Lib Dems ignore the will of the public and make a coalition of losers, against what they promised prior to the election?

Thats not the point
 
My grandmother goes into hospital tomorrow for a tumour removal and at least one week's worth of recovery treatment that she's been waiting for for months.

Apparently some nurses/surgeons/etc. will be striking tomorrow.

**** them.

What's that got to do with the price of cheese?
 
Don't presume people are stupid because they are following instructions given them by the institutions involved, it is not unreasonable to expect the individual to give reasonable notice of their intentions.


Lobby your MP for a change in the law then because currently, whilst an employer can ask if you intend to participate in industrial actions, you are under no obligation to answer.
 
Back
Top Bottom