• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3D Mark Mesh Shader benchmark released

Grim5

Grim5

Grim5

Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
21,625
Now available, benchmark your graphic's cards Mesh Shading ability to see how well your GPU is able to utilize this Direct X 12 Ultimate feature - we expect games this year to start using Mesh Shaders

https://videocardz.com/newz/ul-rele...t-results-of-nvidia-ampere-and-amd-rdna2-gpus

Some results below, ignore the Mesh Shader Off/On column, the important number is the % increase.

For RDNA 2 its around 550%
For Turing its around 400%
For Ampere its around 700%


https://i.~ibb.co~/0JbPMGC/Capture12121212.png
 
Last edited:
IIRC RDNA is using a fallback method for this as the performance path was never completed - not that it would make it miraculously faster than Ampere if they did.
 
Mesh Shading may have some thing but this benchmark leaves a lot to be desired.

Mesh Shaders off, a 1660 Ti is faster than a 3090, seriously?

3D Mark have been putting out some real garbage lately.
 
Kaapstad said:
Mesh Shading may have some thing but this benchmark leaves a lot to be desired.

Mesh Shaders off, a 1660 Ti is faster than a 3090, seriously?

3D Mark have been putting out some real garbage lately.
Click to expand...


As I said ignore those two columns, it's the % change that matters
 
Raiden85 said:
Asus strix 3090 OC I go from 67fps to 618fps, an 817% improvement :eek:

http://www.3dmark.com/ms/2464
Click to expand...

Just remember this is a simple geometry test - you will never see a 800% framerate boost in games released with this feature, the performance jump affects geometry shading performance only which is just one aspect that goes into a single frame. I'd estimate real world performance improvement on your card will be about 20% extra FPS in games that support Mesh Shading[/QUOTE]
 
Grim5 said:
As I said ignore those two columns, it's the % change that matters
Click to expand...

Unfortunately it is a % change that is based on a rotten foundation.

In normal use a 3090 is quicker than all the other NVidia cards in that table, the benchmark does not reflect that.
 
A joke of benchmark.
But it looks even better on AMD since they get like 1.5k% improvements. :D
So really it means the 3000 series from Nvidia and the 6000 series from AMD are much less powerful than the old series ( especially the AMD cards ) but then they can use new tricks to end up ahead in FPS. Especially Radeon cards are doing some magic, they increase the performance with 1.500%.

Without the new tricks there is no difference between the 1660 and the 3090...and the new Radeon cards are probably much worse than the 5000 series. :D
 
fs123 said:
Must be with the latest driver released today. Not sure if mesh shaders will make a huge difference in games but a nice boost in performance for AMD cards bringing them back in line even though AMD says there are issues with the driver.
https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/c.../?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
Click to expand...
At least they reacted fast to this one but there is a problem with the test that is sure. 1660 can't be as good as the 3000 series and twice as good as the last Radeon cards at anything.
Also other older Nvidia cards are running Mesh shader off at 10 to 20% ahead of Ampere. That's BS.
 
Kaapstad said:
Unfortunately it is a % change that is based on a rotten foundation.

In normal use a 3090 is quicker than all the other NVidia cards in that table, the benchmark does not reflect that.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, well AMD's number changed with a new driver, perhapos Nvidia needs a new driver too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom