Well it's ambiguous as the (3+3) could be on the bottom.

Brackets are the top priority. So you do anything in brackets first.
Well it's ambiguous as the (3+3) could be on the bottom.
Brackets are the top priority. So you do anything in brackets first.
Yes you can darling, that's how you get fractionsYou can't have a numerator greater than denominator can you?
I see, what you mean, but if that's the case. You would use more brackets to indicate that the (3+3) is part of the bottom row, when typing it like this without an equation font.
You can't have a numerator greater than denominator can you?
+1 tbh. All you people saying, 'How can you be that dumb?!' (whilst, I assume, masturbating furiously at your own smug intellect), it obviously isn't that simple, some people aren't that good at maths and would go through it step by step.
And with my basic understanding of maths, shouldn't it be 40+(40x0)+1 or something to get 41 as the answer?
Worked or whored?Please close, don't insult those who have wored hard.
It's clearly designed to be ambiguous, as that guy said they try and teach BODMAS but there is no written rule. It's a convention and if this was in a paper it would be annihilated in review.
The sensible person would do that but this problem is just designed to spark debate.
Anyone who didn't answer 41 should not be allowed to vote and should not be allowed to have children.
You'd better kill my kids then and I have never voted anyway because they are all liars.