I had a Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ (£750 from OCUK in Jan '21) for a few months until I was able to get my 3080 FE from the official distributor in June.. and that was sheer luck with it then going unavailable again within minutes. I actually sold the RX 6800 for what I paid for it too. It was an excellent GPU and my first AMD card since the Radeon HD 5870!! It will be interesting to see what RDNA 3 brings to the table.
My main reason for wanting the RX 4080 is for DLSS 3 which my favourite game, MS Flight Simulator now fully supports. Not sure how FSR compares and if MS Flight Sim supports it.
Anyhow, that's a good point about a possible Ti and it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth if it's released at the same MSRP as the non-Ti which in turn drops in price.
Maybe I should just return it or refuse it at the door on Monday.
The 4080 is weak sauce. It only takes one read of the spec list and CUDA cores and etc to realise that. The 12gb? dear god.
People become a lot wiser when they have less money.
I think the most glaring thing about the 40 series launch for me was that Nvidia did not even want to make it. What I mean is? they would have been much happier sitting back and letting the 30 series sell out. Because they ramped up too hard AGAIN and made too many, riding on the mining wave. And that has bitten them hard.
Problem is they had no choice but to launch. The shareholders were restless, and share prices and profits were down. There was just one problem that every one should have totally sniffed out. Or rather the lack of - AMD. I know a lot of people, especially here, think they are not a threat to the mighty Nvidia, and that Nvidia pretend like they don't matter. The thing is? they clearly do. Because when the 6900XT beat the 3090 in raster, and Nvidia's bully boy tactics did not work on reviewers? they launched the 3090ti. Which was a massive kick in the teeth for those who bought the 3090, especially at the prices they were changing hands for. BUT ! the big difference was that it wasn't *that* much faster than a 3090, it just made Jen feel all warm and tingly knowing he had the fastest cards out there.
And that brings me back to the whiff that people should have sniffed out. When he taped out the 40 series AMD were utterly silent. There weren't even any decent rumours going around from wafflers like Moores Law Is Dead and etc. So? Jen released the absolute MINIMUM IMO. Knowing all too well that the product stack would likely be completely replaced once AMD showed their hand. And it will. Like I said, I give it three months and that chasm of a divide between the 4080 and 4090 will HAVE to be filled, because that is EXACTLY where both of AMD's far cheaper cards are going to sit.
And that is exactly why he binned off the 12gb. Because it was even more insulting than the 4080 16gb. Which btw? are insulting. Because that is the 40 series you are going to see until AMD have cards out there.
IMO? even the 4090 was weak. I mean sure, it looks amazing and mostly is. But is is a far cry from what Lovelace can do. Ampere was absolutely awful. Worst gen step since Fermi, which was actually a bigger leap lol. So I knew that when they went back to TSMC and showed what it could do it would be incredible. The problem? like I said, he hasn't showed his hand. He has been forced into releasing something that he had no idea what AMD were going to launch. Usually? he doesn't have to wait. This time? he has. And that is why the cards are weak. Because if he blew his load and AMD put egg on his face he would have nowhere to go.