Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 589
- Location
- London, England
In a bit of a panic here. Have been getting odd results with my new ATI 4870x2, Q6600 (o/c'ed to 3.2ghz), P5Q-E, 4GB setup - things like the occasional bit of slowdown in Half-life 2, as well as severe dips below 60fps in Bioshock. 3DMark 06 result comes in at around 17,500 marks, which I'm pretty happy with. However, I've just tried the furmark 1.40 bench and the results are pretty abysmal. Bare in mind I've just updated to Cat 8.9. I'm getting:-
FurMark v1.4.0
Fullscreen Score.
[ SCORE: 2798 o3Marks ]
- FPS Min: 40
- FPS Max: 65
- FPS Avg: 47
- Time: 60000 ms
- Res: 1280x1024 / MSAA: 0X
- Renderer: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Active GPUs: 2
- Drivers: Unknown version
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
- CPU Speed: 3599 MHz (it's actually 3200 MHZ; I've reduced the multiplier)
- OS: Windows Vista ver.6.0 build 6001 [Service Pack 1]
This can't be right, can it? I'm worried the weak chink im my machine's armour could be the PSU. It's a Seasonic 600W. It's served me fine up till now and I haven't had any actual problems running the new ATI card on it. If it wasn't up to the job, could that explain the FurMark results?
FurMark v1.4.0
Fullscreen Score.
[ SCORE: 2798 o3Marks ]
- FPS Min: 40
- FPS Max: 65
- FPS Avg: 47
- Time: 60000 ms
- Res: 1280x1024 / MSAA: 0X
- Renderer: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Active GPUs: 2
- Drivers: Unknown version
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
- CPU Speed: 3599 MHz (it's actually 3200 MHZ; I've reduced the multiplier)
- OS: Windows Vista ver.6.0 build 6001 [Service Pack 1]
This can't be right, can it? I'm worried the weak chink im my machine's armour could be the PSU. It's a Seasonic 600W. It's served me fine up till now and I haven't had any actual problems running the new ATI card on it. If it wasn't up to the job, could that explain the FurMark results?


