4930k RIVE 2133mhz RAM

8 Pack said:
If you dont use progs that really stress your PC. Why do you need 32gb of ram then. Get rid of 16gb that you dont need and raise your clocking.
Click to expand...

Haha, I can't do that... it wouldn't look right!!!!!

The blocks end up either overhanging the CPU block, or not over the DIMMS properly (as in you've only got support in slots 1 & 3 not 2 & 4 so there is a larger over hang on one side than the other...

It was an acestics choice rather than a requirement choice.
 
Right,

I got it stable @
4644mhz (36x129) @ 1.325v
RAM @ 2064mhz (9-11-10-27-2)
RAM is stable at 1.75v, lower can cause some instabilties.

(This does show in AIDA64 as 1.74v, but I don't think that's too much of a problem)

Core Temps are around 63c when hammering the system.

Gaming leaves core temps around 35c-40c

I can get it to boot at 37x multi, but it bluescreens, even at 1.4v so I'm not really sure if I'm going to get much better than this at the moment.
 
Memtimings_zpsf3896b71.png~original


Here's where I'm at right now:
 
Thats looking ok bud

Also try
Multi x36 @ volts your comfortable with
Put your ram primarys too 10-12-11-27-2 and move up to the next setting 2333mhz
Put your bclk back to 125 and test

Then on bclk go 126,127 etc, see how you get on and compare
 
no think he means stick with what you have and tune your ram down using the settings provided, set comand rate and dram refresh interval in bios and i would do rest using memtweakit and if they work then change manually in bios.
 
Nickolp1974 said:
sorry for hijack jester, 8pack can you tell me why my tWR wont go lower keeps reverting to 28 any lower than 16 when using memtweakit????

Click to expand...

I'm not a fan of blindly turning down the sub-timings as many have a relationship to other timings that if ignored can have strange results i.e. the RAM will still pass memtest, etc. but you can actually get performance degredation or even stuttering in games, applications just randomly stop responding, etc.

A lot of manufacturers have taken to embedding some timing tables in their SPD data that can be found using i.e. AIDA Extreme under motherboard->SPD (not sure if theres any other tool that shows it) which can give you an idea of what to shoot for with a given CAS latency - tweaking the sub-timings down below that generally has little to any performance benefit as mostly it comes from CAS, tRAS and CMD rate.
 
Is there any performance gain from setting tWL to anything other than CAS-1? I don't have extensive experience of X79 but on other platforms that gave optimal performance (aslong as stable) and anything else = worse performance.
 
Command rate 1 is a little unstable, can I loosen any of the other timings to improve this?

It doesn't blue screen, but things aren't as stable as they were, and pi fails after about 3 seconds!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom