Don't pay too much attention to that VRAM used, as that was with everything maxed and I will put money on caching going on and what is being shown isn't what is needed.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
This on a Single GPU? I was told once that the Vram reading you split it in half to get your real usage.
If this is true your real usage for each card was 2263mb
looks nice. Though the bezel on that Asus looks better. I can't help but think about what you said about the stand being wobbly... That new Asus monitor and AOC monitor look good if the stand ends up being better. Though in pics alone I do like the Samsungs look, it is very modern and minimalist. Guess that doesn't pan out....
Why do the icons look so big? Aren't they supposed to be really small? It looks like it would on my 1440p screen.
I mean, I am used to 1080p on a 15 inch laptop, is it much worse than that on websites?
But the question is...it is just Sammy's TN panels, or TN panels in general?
Next we just need Nvidia or AMD to work out an external or graphic card built-in solution for G-sync/Freesync instead of requiring a piece of hardware inside specific monitors...
I think that 4K 60Hz monitors becoming affordable so quickly is really at odd with the high price G-sync monitors...
I said it 'might' not be enough at the start of the thread and that was based off the beta results GameGPU posted which i made pretty clear at the time. However when asked about 2gb being enough after the first few pages i also said it should be enough but it may not be enough at 1440P/1600P, which turns out to be correct. Things do like to get twisted here though as we can see earlier in the thread. Apparently AMD said it, when they said no such thing and were talking about 1440P, just like i was.
I'm glad you love your 4k monitor mate. For me though I don't see the point in 4k yet...it's too early for most still. I saw 4k today and wasn't that impressed tbh. It impressed me more when the screen was over 50". Below 50" it was that all that.
Just my opinion greg. Like I said glad your enjoying it. That's all that matters.
Please don't turn this thread into a vram/graph war, I was enjoying reading Gregster's musings.
You cant even max everything with 1440p. So your titans are doing well at 4k.
From my own experiences I would not want to run a 4k screen as a primary display due to poor os and application support. I would wait for not only updated hdmi and dp connectors but also the next point releases of windows or OS X.
Anandtech chucked up a review of the dell 4k ips panel earlier, I would check out that review as an illustration of what's wrong at the software level.
I would go 1x1080p at 120hz and 1x 4k at 60hz and then add the other 4k panels in two years time.
Why dont you use the Windows Magnifier tool for apps?
I am interested myself with it being £500 for 4k monitor.
Great review and benches by the way.
if i get a second 290... arma3 might cope... please help me justify it! If i sold my 1440p screen It wouldnt cost too much even. But then these are not available here for a while yet
thanks restored my faith in graphical quality ! Guess zoomed in with such large images shows things far worse but the video shows it really for how it looks and feels.