5070 = 4090 for 499.

[tamzzy]

The 5070 Ti does look like it could be the sweet spot in the range. Very close specs to the 5080, while being a few hundred quid cheaper.

not quite, IMO

5090 = 21760 cores @ 2.41GHz = $1999
5080 = 10752 cores @ 2.62GHz = $999
5070Ti = 8960 cores @ 2.45GHz = $749
5070 = 6144 cores @ 2.51GHz = $549

to me, it looks like prices scales nearly exactly linearly with the CUDA core count (and performance taking into account the clockspeeds), and possibly by extension, rasterisation performance
looks like gone are the days of lower-end sweet-spot value for money and the halo price premium
given that the 5090 has 32GB VRAM, it may actually be the best buy lol, and no I'm not going to buy a 5090

 

[Troezar]

Tbf, those sort of people probably won't notice the cons of full dlss and frame gen, so for him it might as well be true right?

So you're saying ignorance is bliss?

 

[RanxZy]

not quite, IMO

5090 = 21760 cores @ 2.41GHz = $1999
5080 = 10752 cores @ 2.62GHz = $999
5070Ti = 8960 cores @ 2.45GHz = $749
5070 = 6144 cores @ 2.51GHz = $549

to me, it looks like prices scales nearly exactly linearly with the CUDA (rasterisation) performance
looks like gone are the days of lower-end sweet-spot value for money and the halo price premium

We'll see when the official raster benchmarks are out.

With the specs so close I wouldn't be surprised if the 5080 is only about 10% faster than the 5070 Ti apples to apples - while the costing over 20% more.

 

[tamzzy]

We'll see when the official raster benchmarks are out.

With the specs so close I wouldn't be surprised if the 5080 is only about 10% faster than the 5070 Ti apples to apples - while the costing over 20% more.

my guess is that the 5080 will be 20-25% faster (at a 33% price increase)

 

[Jono8]

my guess is that the 5080 will be 20-25% faster (at a 33% price increase)

It only has a 20% core count bump and a 6% speed bump in clock speed and memory bandwidth.

It's rare that these work out as 1:1 with raster performance (IE it normally comes in lower) so I'm only expecting it to be 15% or so faster based on the specs.

This is unless the AI tops makes a significant difference.


Will have to wait till reviews come out, but as they have the same amount of vram, I don't think the 5080 is going to be worth it over the 5070ti.

Nvidia really should have bumped the 5080 vram to 20 GB at least, and given both the 5070 and 5070ti 16gb.

 

[tamzzy]

It only has a 20% core count bump and a 6% speed bump in clock speed and memory bandwidth.
It's rare that these work out as 1:1 with raster performance (IE it normally comes in lower) so I'm only expecting it to be 15% or so faster based on the specs.
This is unless the AI tops makes a significant difference.
Will have to wait till reviews come out, but as they have the same amount of vram, I don't think the 5080 is going to be worth it over the 5070ti.
Nvidia really should have bumped the 5080 vram to 20 GB at least, and given both the 5070 and 5070ti 16gb.

ah yeah, good point
and yeah, all now is theorycrafting/speculating
bring on the new cards lol

 

[RanxZy]

Yeah, completely speculation for now until we get proper benchmark tests in.