that is definatly not right bruv.I'm using the EVGA 280 and it litterally shoots up to 90+ C in about 10-15 seconds
im using a gigabyte auros b550 elite v2
so mine aint even top end mobo wise its just middle
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
that is definatly not right bruv.I'm using the EVGA 280 and it litterally shoots up to 90+ C in about 10-15 seconds
I'm using the EVGA 280 and it litterally shoots up to 90+ C in about 10-15 seconds in Prime 95 Smallest FFTs, I'll probably be home in about an hour so i'll test Cinebench and CPU-z and post back results plus PBO setting in BIOS
Certainly heat density. The CCD is only about 80mm² so quite dense.
As regards the 5600X, like the 3600 it is one CCD but only uses 6 out of the 8 cores. Ideally they would only use dies where 1 or 2 cores are defect, but since 7nm yields are meant to be so good (and 80mm² is pretty small), they will fuse-off perfectly good dies for these too.
Now, given the choice when fusing of 2 out of 8 cores we'd hope that they will fuse off the ones with the worse voltage profile, but again no guarantee. Still, even if a 5600X and a 5800X had cores which were all the same, having two less should mean they run a bit cooler - all else being equal.
As for the OP's temp: I don't think they are that bad. In terms of perf/watt the 5700X is actually pretty good. In terms of max core temp, not so much. However, these chips will throttle long before they do themselves any harm.