6 Points, No insurance!

[TW]Fox said:
You are pretty much stuffed. You drove a car with no insurance - it is YOUR responsbility to check you are insured.

I'm agreeing with Mr Fox all the way.

If this incident was in Swindon and you had hit my Vauxhall Corsa SXI 1.7 dti without insurance, do you think you'd have the change in your pockets to pay for the damages?.. :rolleyes: well probably, but that's not the point.

You broke the law. If you are ever hit by an unisured driver, let us know how it pans out.
 
!bluetonic! said:
I'm agreeing with Mr Fox all the way.

If this incident was in Swindon and you had hit my Vauxhall Corsa SXI 1.7 dti without insurance, do you think you'd have the change in your pockets to pay for the damages?.. :rolleyes: well probably, but that's not the point.

You broke the law. If you are ever hit by an unisured driver, let us know how it pans out.

The thing is, having been hit by uninsured drivers, usually to avoid run-ins with the law they simply lie and say someone else (who was insured) was driving. Having been hit by a bald 40 year old man the insurance company sent through details saying Mrs blah blah was driving at the time. I spoke to a solicitor who said to just ignore it and let the claim go through, otherwise we risked losing our no-claims.
 
Fensta said:
Crud.

How is his mate meant to know if the driver of his car has DOC or not? He is obliged (within his own right) to check the document, but has no legal requirement to do so.

How sure on this are you?
There is an offence "allowing an uninsured driver to drive your motor vehicle" or similar.
I would fully expect the owner of the vehicle to be in trouble over this as well.
 
stoofa said:
How sure on this are you?
There is an offence "allowing an uninsured driver to drive your motor vehicle" or similar.
I would fully expect the owner of the vehicle to be in trouble over this as well.

The owner of the vehicle in my friends case was in the vehice. Basically, an accident occured which was actually non fault. My friend was driving his girlfriends car (with her in it) when the accident occured. The road was closed, police called, all parties were ok.

Police gave a producer to my friend. He wne to show his documents at station, she said, your not insured to drive this car, he went "what", matter esculated. He got done, nothing happened to girlfriend (owner of car).

I'm very sure, there is no legal requirement for the owner to check a drivers claim that they have DOC, therefore, in most cases, I guess it is likely the owner of the car will not be prosecuted.
 
Last edited:
stoofa said:
How sure on this are you?
There is an offence "allowing an uninsured driver to drive your motor vehicle" or similar.
I would fully expect the owner of the vehicle to be in trouble over this as well.

The Police told her she would get 6 points, She's in her late 30's and never had points in her life. She isn't even really that bothered about this.

It's my license and my job we are worried about.

I would rather pay like a large fine and have a 14 day ban, or even 5 points.

I really hope they do not take my lisence, as i was unaware i was commiting an offence, and its my first in my whole life. Just the waiting i don't like. And keeping it from my mum!
 
It seems a bit harsh. Ok, you were breaking the law and need to be punished. But making you lose your new job over it is stupid IMO, what you going to do now? Start claiming the dole? If the judge is sensible, he'll see that you' re not a repeat offender and he'll give you 5points to allow you to keep your job...but then again...

EDIT: just read that it's only 6 miles to your work. Get on your bike!
 
Fensta said:
The owner of the vehicle in my friends case was in the vehice. Basically, an accident occured which was actually non fault. My friend was driving his girlfriends car (with her in it) when the accident occured. The road was closed, police called, all parties were ok.

Police gave a producer to my friend. He wne to show his documents at station, she said, your not insured to drive this car, he went "what", matter esculated. He got done, nothing happened to girlfriend (owner of car).

I'm very sure, there is no legal requirement for the owner to check a drivers claim that they have DOC, therefore, in most cases, I guess it is likely the owner of the car will not be prosecuted.

I did the same thing, and she is my girlfriend ;)

What exactly happened in this case then?
 
Samtheman1k said:
It seems a bit harsh. Ok, you were breaking the law and need to be punished. But making you lose your new job over it is stupid IMO, what you going to do now? Start claiming the dole? If the judge is sensible, he'll see that you' re not a repeat offender and he'll give you 5points to allow you to keep your job...but then again...

I really hope this, its a job i've wanted for years in the Honda Production Factory in Swindon. A really good job, got a phone call today to tell me i was in, then i get all this rubish. It's a very respectable job which im sure i'll enjoy.
 
Samtheman1k said:
EDIT: just read that it's only 6 miles to your work. Get on your bike!

Its 6 miles of unlit dark countryside roads at 5am, dont really want to ride that in winter!
 
andy2k said:
I did the same thing, and she is my girlfriend ;)

What exactly happened in this case then?

It was never even mentioned. Not by the police or anyone. He went to court, they banned him for 21 days, and fined him £35. Nothing happened to his girlfriend. She had been feeling really poorly. For her to drive would have been madness and most likely cause an accident. She gave him permission to drive, both of them blisfully unaware that in actual fact he did not have DOC. his policy had no exclusion to say he could or could not drive another car. He was however, 25 and had had DOC with his previous years insurer. Through a broker, they changed his insurance company (sabre or something) and the policy did not continue like for like.

Hope that hjelps

Fortunatel, he was due to go to France for the duration of the ban on holiday. He is perfectly entitled to drive his car over there and be covered by his insurance regardless of a UK ban. Suffice to say, they both made sure they had DOC after that
 
Last edited:
laissez-faire said:
Am I the only one who finds the whole insurance issue a bit stupid?

I mean suppose I didn't have insurance, I would still be liable for third party damage so I think the fact the law forbids persons from accepting the liability themselves to be against human rights. As far as I am concerned if I have available to me the disposable income to cover the costs of any damage I cause why should I be forced to have insurance? Why are cars so different to anything else? I could easily cause a lot of damage with many things I own... but I don't have to insure those.

When arguing this point before I usually get told it is because those without insurance tend to be financially pushed and probably wouldn't be able to produce 200k if they destroyed a Ferrari.... fair enough point but what about those who could and wish to take the chance?

And what if you cause a 10 car pile up on the motorway (including a few lorries and smashing a bridge), paralysing a few people, all who thus require millions to support them for the rest of their lives?

Can't think of many people who could afford to pay that out of their bank balance...
 
Fensta said:
It was never even mentioned. Not by the police or anyone. He went to court, they banned him for 21 days, and fined him £35. Nothing happened to his girlfriend. She had been feeling really poorly. For her to drive would have been madness and most likely cause an accident. She gave him permission to drive, both of them blisfully unaware that in actual fact he did not have DOC. his policy had no exclusion to say he could or could not drive another car. He was however, 25 and had had DOC with his previous years insurer. Through a broker, they changed his insurance company (sabre or something) and the policy did not continue like for like.

Hope that hjelps

Fortunatel, he was due to go to France for the duration of the ban on holiday. He is perfectly entitled to drive his car over there and be covered by his insurance regardless of a UK ban. Suffice to say, they both made sure they had DOC after that

Finally when was this?
I've heard in the last year or so they have started to come down heavy on this stuff.

Cheers for your reply, really helps me.
 
andy2k said:
Finally when was this?
I've heard in the last year or so they have started to come down heavy on this stuff.

Cheers for your reply, really helps me.

July 2004, went to court November 2004. May have changed, but I really don't think so. If your GF gets a summons then she gets a summons. Seems kinda harsh though.

Also, as a side note. He had to pay no money towards the other party and their car was written off! I think they must have gone through uninsured losses. His GFs car however was not covered, and it was pointless trying to claim through the other parties insurance, even though it was here fault. He paid the £3k damage to his GFs car.
 
Last edited:
Fensta said:
July 2004, went to court November 2004. May have changed, but I really don't think so. If your GF gets a summons then she gets a summons. Seems kinda harsh.

I know what you mean. She would hate court.

When i go, i will explain i thought i was covered, and that she was unfit to drive etc. She doesnt need to go with me no?

I want to keep her out of it, i told the officer its 100% my fault, and that i will take all of it, as i don't want her involved.

EDIT: on the last page someone was fined over a grand, and your mate 35 quid. Its all so strange.

Cheers for the reply mate.
 
andy2k said:
I know what you mean. She would hate court.

When i go, i will explain i thought i was covered, and that she was unfit to drive etc. She doesnt need to go with me no?

I want to keep her out of it, i told the officer its 100% my fault, and that i will take all of it, as i don't want her involved.

If she has handed over no information, then she cant be summoned. They may want to see her subsequently, but this unlikely.
 
Fensta said:
If she has handed over no information, then she cant be summoned. They may want to see her subsequently, but this unlikely.

They interviewed her in the car, took her details etc. Told her she would get 6 points. She was unwell like i said and just agreeded with them. And she was worried about me as i'd been in their car for nearly an hour.

She doesnt really mind the points, just no court for her, and i'd feel i had to pay her fines if any.
 
Chances are then that she'll get summoned too. This is not a criminal offence so it will just be her and 5/6 other people in the court room. I suggest if she does get a summons that you request to be dealt with together (saves any potential court fees that you may be fined) and you definately pay for a sols. That way you can go through everything with the sols and he will present it to the court in a manner that you will not recognise.

Best £200 my friend ever spent.

Hope it goes ok, let me know if you have anymore questions.

Please note though, as has been said, I cannot guarantee that it will follow this path, its just that your circumstances are extrrememly similar to that of my mates, however his was a year or two ago now. It also depends how the magistrates are felling on the day (its a decision of 3), so all the best with it.

out of interest. how did they find out at the time that you werent insured?
 
She is likley to get points for allowing an uninsured driver to drive her car, i thought it was 6 for you and 3 for her but that's from memory and quite possibly wrong. It's a hard lesson to learn but you've worked it out ....DOC & GAP are two of the most important things to check on your policy though GAP is only a major pita if it's on finance.

They tend to use a slideing scale rule for fines/points, more points = lower fine, lots of ££ = less points. Depending on the nature of your employment you may be given consideration but 6 miles is something i'd not mention in court. I know of one driver with 16 points who is still legally insured and driving due to an amazingly understanding judge.

I have DOC on my policy but the other half doesn't on her's but we are both named drivers on each other's policy, on the bikes she's solo and i've got any other veichle I hold a valid licence and have the appropriate owners permission excluding for hire, reward or personal gain apparently ?! I don't want to find out if that includes car's though!
 
Last edited:
Trickle said:
Six miles is walkable even in bad weather. Some people spend 3 hours per day in the car. I'd rather walk provided its not snowing. Get on yer bike!
It's hardly practical though if you're in a job where you have to wear a suit and/or have meetings, need to carry a briefcase or other materials.
 
Back
Top Bottom