Hmmm. Not so much "added" to but more created entirely different point.@garnett I was editing my post while you replied, I've added a whole new paragraph. I know you'll still be annoyed by everything but there's some explanations there.
You're asserted a completely strawman argument...Oh the irony. Due to your "poor research" you've written that the aircraft is "drab olive", which is green, when the correct research would have easily shown that the aircraft is "drab grey".
When I mentioned earlier about "Internet Experts" vs people with real world experience I think this might be a helpful example. I get that you don't understand "why" we need the repaint (fair enough) as not many people will know that flying at 500+mph for hundreds of thousands of miles over the last 4 years just might damage the paint just a bit (Zefan wrote a nice post about it) but, as mentioned in the OP, the majority of the cost is for the "refit" which is for new/additional secure communications equipment rather than giving Boris a gold bath and a four-poster bed etc, which would understandably be considered a waste.
Of course if the complaints are just based on "Boris Bad" then no amount of discussion about this will make any logical sense.
I say:
You say:-I actually think it makes sense to smarten up what is a very drab looking plane - and, like it or not, image counts.
....And notwithstanding that, you fail to address the point that this thing got a £10,000,000 overhaul 4 years ago.I get that you don't understand "why" we need the repaint (fair enough) as not many people will know that flying at 500+mph for hundreds of thousands of miles over the last 4 years just might damage the paint just a bit (Zefan wrote a nice post about it)
Happy to read anything you can post about the new/additional secure communications equipment...