Soldato
Seriously...I fail to see the reasoning comparing SLI 970 to 7990 and 7970, when they have nothing in common...?
lmao they both have 3gb VRAM
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Seriously...I fail to see the reasoning comparing SLI 970 to 7990 and 7970, when they have nothing in common...?
Im sure skyrim or something with a couple of texture mods and ENBs will kill 970s
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-Responds-GTX-970-35GB-Memory-Issue
The GeForce GTX 970 is equipped with 4GB of dedicated graphics memory. However the 970 has a different configuration of SMs than the 980, and fewer crossbar resources to the memory system. To optimally manage memory traffic in this configuration, we segment graphics memory into a 3.5GB section and a 0.5GB section.
There. What they haven't said, however, is what happens when you actually go over 3.5gb and try and use the last 500mb.
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-Responds-GTX-970-35GB-Memory-Issue
The GeForce GTX 970 is equipped with 4GB of dedicated graphics memory. However the 970 has a different configuration of SMs than the 980, and fewer crossbar resources to the memory system. To optimally manage memory traffic in this configuration, we segment graphics memory into a 3.5GB section and a 0.5GB section.
Wait, so the GTX970 is actually a 3.5GB card with 500MB of shared memory or something?
i refuse to accept a ubisoft game as a standard for testing anything other than acceptable amount of bugs in a game.
Wait, so the GTX970 is actually a 3.5GB card with 500MB of shared memory or something?
Wait, so the GTX970 is actually a 3.5GB card with 500MB of shared memory or something?
its 3.5 of the regular fast RAM that you find in graphics cards, then the rest is some slow ass POS RAM just so nvidia can call it a 4gb card, when you go over 3.5 it will use this slow RAM, but its so slow, that the card takes a crap and makes your games look like a piece of art from picasso
its 3.5 of the regular fast RAM that you find in graphics cards, then the rest is some slow ass POS RAM just so nvidia can call it a 4gb card, when you go over 3.5 it will use this slow RAM, but its so slow, that the card takes a crap and makes your games look like a piece of art from picasso
Im sure skyrim or something with a couple of texture mods and ENBs will kill 970s
No no no dude, that's not true. The ram is all the same, be it Samsung, Hynix, whatever. It's the memory controller causing the issue. So for example, you use up to 3500mb ram and you get full 256 bit bandwidth. Then you over flow that and run into the last and you only get like 64 bit bandwidth..
Ugh, it's hard to explain but yeah, the ram is all the same. They don't fit the cards with 3.5gb of good ram then 500mb of crap ram.
Check the Skyrim thread, plenty of people have it pimped to the max with 970's, myself included!
SLI disabledI was not expecting GPUZ to show 4gb for the 970, this backs up what NVidia are saying that the 970 memory is split 3.5 and 0.5gb with GPUZ showing the 3.5gb part.
What were your minimums like as this will also highlight if the VRAM is holding you back.
72.88 for the average is a good score for a 970.
Seriously...I fail to see the reasoning comparing SLI 970 to 7990 and 7970, when they have nothing in common...?
.!
Gigabyte have released a bios update.