A JRS project thread - 1968 Citroën ID19

JRS

JRS

Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2004
Posts
19,708
Location
Burton-on-Trent
(alt. title - "How on earth Citroën didn't end up owning the entire industry I'll never know...")

For a little while now my dad and I have been on the lookout for another car project after our last one was cut somewhat short. We knew it had to be something quirky and classic. Initially we started looking at Citroën 2CV breadvans, but mum put her foot down over that. Then it was regular bodied 2CVs, and I'd seen a lovely early '60s example for sale in Dorset. But the more I looked at stuff, the more I found out that for not very much more money you could get into a DS-type.

I found an example for sale a couple of villages away and arranged a viewing and test drive. Driving it around ruined me for other cars. The way it loped along, utterly un-bothered by the horrendous state of the roads around here. I've driven some comfy stuff, but this was on another level. We didn't go for it in the end as there was a bit too much bodywork for my dad and I to sort at home, but then another car popped up on the market. Not a DS, strictly. The ID was the lower model, less powerful engines and simpler hydraulics - they retain the DS suspension, but the brakes are simpler and have a regular pedal instead of the mushroom shaped 'on-off' switch, power steering isn't fitted as standard and the hydraulic-operated semi automatic gearbox wasn't an option. This particular example was a non-PAS car, but had the later style front end with driving lamps that turn with the steering. I drove down the other week to crawl all over it and go out in it on a test drive. Some jobs to do, to be sure. But incredibly solid where it needed to be, and very complete. A price was agreed, and yesterday we fetched it home.

Having put about a hundred miles on it, I've learned a few things. One, the unassisted steering is rather heavy when there's only 26psi in the front tyres :eek: I remedied that last night. Two, there are stretches of the M1 (particularly around Newport Pag. services) where the road surface in an average modern car feels a bit...'lunar'. This thing barely even sees it - there's just this slight raising on it's suspension and a muffled thump sound and it serenely charges on. Three, Citroën really cheaped out on the engines in these cars. The unit in this one is the 1985cc engine, redesigned from the original 1911cc one with a shorter stroke and a five-bearing crank but it's not what you'd call refined. It is a hemi though, and with c.90hp it'll bowl along at motorway speeds without feeling like it's particularly struggling.

The brakes are exceptionally good - using the same high-pressure hydraulics as the suspension, you can really haul the car up in a hurry. The seats are superb, like living room furniture. Roadholding is excellent, though it leans a lot when cornering due to the way the suspension is set up (Citroën never really sorted that until the Xantia/XM generation of cars). The body cuts such a clean hole in the air at speed that you don't get a great deal of wind noise, and happily you can even roll the windows part down at motorway speeds without any roar. I say 'happily' because the ventilation is utterly bobbins :D I need to see for sure if that's an issue with the design or with this particular example, but I've heard other complaints about it being marginal before.

Stuff that we have to do

1) Wiper motor wiring is a disaster, needs re-doing
2) Side trim missing off of the nearside front door and offside rear one a bit damaged, needs a new pair or one new+one fixing
3) Headliner inside is gone, needs replacing
4) Paint flaking off the bottom edge of the rear doors, needs sanding back and repainting
5) Car is a bit scratched and grubby, needs a good clean and polish
6) Dashboard is untidy, needs tidying and paint
7) Drivers seat cushion has some stitching coming away and a missing patch on the squab, needs an upholsterer to make it good
8) Seatbelts are crappy fixed length ones and there's none in the back, needs retractables throughout
9) Engine ignition is still by points and condenser, needs electronic ignition
10) Car hasn't been driven for four years, needs driving :D

Pictures to follow as soon as I get home again, but a quick pic from yesterday - car too long to get into frame from where I had to stand!

p581nGp.jpg

Also note my fat frame reflected in that paintwork :o

And one from when I went down to view it the other week:

VqfPTdC.jpg
 
Last edited:
Grubby but sound

zpqXvqv.jpg
Tl4gpBH.jpg

The office

WGr8QQ0.jpg
sLWd3e9.jpg
PwASDI5.jpg

The engine room

jmtULey.jpg
8YFjO88.jpg

Like a carb but smaller :D

LZb13vu.jpg

The wiper wiring disaster that's 'job number one' to sort :eek::mad:

syTcEhu.jpg

Offside rear door and trim that wants attention

Aq0yLJE.jpg
 
Last edited:
Mo' pics added.

Absolutely fantastic :cool:

So many cars have a point to prove, that car is just above it all, completely effortlessly cool, hope you guys enjoy it!

Cheers Diddums. I hope we enjoy it too. Was a bit hot for pa today to try and take his first drive in it (he about branded himself on the metal of the seatbelt buckle!), but he moved it around on the drive and got the feel for the controls.

I love these cars! I always wanted one when I was a kid.

I wish I had the space and know how to buy a classic and do it up. It must be so satisfying .

I won't kid you, space is one thing that you kinda need with anything beyond simple tidying as a project. But know-how is really easy to pick up. Cars from before fuel injection and widespread electronics are often a doddle to work on (think older Fords, BMC products, Mercs from when they were genuinely built like tanks rather than trading on past glories).

If they weren't so nickable, and being nicked with such alarming regularity, I'd recommend a Landy like our old one as a starter classic any day of the week. Easy to get bits for, only six moving parts all of which can be fixed by tapping on them with a hammer in vaguely the right spot and incredibly good fun to drive.

Other ID19 observations and weirdness

Some things that you don't really think about until you get up close. I was pumping the tyres up last night, and every time I do that on any of the more modern cars in our 'fleet' I end up with my hands black with brake dust. Not so here, and I didn't make the connection until I was indoors again - inboard brake discs :cool:

The engine is set very far back in the chassis, making it halfway to a front-mid design. This serves two purposes. One, weight distribution is improved. Two, spark plug number four is an utter ******* to change!

You can tell that the model line was designed around the semi-auto 'box and the mushroom brake actuator. Because the clutch pedal is at a very different height to the brake pedal which is itself at a very different height to the accelerator. This is not the car for heel-and-toe.

The parking brake is exceptionally good. Only better one I've ever come across was the Landy, and that acted on the driveline rather than the wheels.

The roof panel is made from fibreglass, for less weight and a lower CoG.

As you start to push on the brake pedal you can hear the hydraulics getting themselves ready to go full tilt on stopping the car. Hopefully I never have to find out just how quick they can bring the car to a halt...
 
Last edited:
Awesome. There was a moment a few months ago (after watching The Mentalist) that I looked around at these. However, the lack of a nearby specialist put me off.

Coward :D

That steering wheel.. Yuck! But the rest of the car is lovely

The steering wheel actually makes a lot of sense in-use. Just looks odd coming from virtually anything else!

Thanks to everyone so far for the kind words. If it's not stupidly hot later I'm going to get after the wiper wiring - pa would like to be able to drive the car at the weekend and rain is forecast. I'll probably RainX the screen as well, but I've never known that to do much until you're doing more than 45mph (at which point it becomes the single greatest product ever invented IMO).
 
Whatever happened to Citroen? :(

They built technologically advanced, quirky, ruthlessly individualistic stuff when all the market wanted was a boring, grey, mid-size saloon car that looked and acted like every other boring, grey, mid-sized saloon car. So they ran out of money and the French government strongly encouraged a merger with Peugeot.

But hey, even latterly there have still been sparks. Try a C6 sometime, especially one of the rarer-than-rare petrol ones if you can find one.
 
Dug into the wiper wiring tonight. I can power the motor direct from the +ve terminal on the battery so I know a) the motor works and b) the motor is actually earthed. And even without wiring around from the battery I've got 12V at the motor. But I can't make the switch do anything yet. Ran out of useful light tonight so I'll pick back up tomorrow where I left off.

***edit***

God I love electrics :rolleyes::D I think I have this. Fuse 2 goes to the wiper switch, then the motor. The earth on the motor also earths the screenwash pump. I know that earth is good, and I know that at least one power supply wire to the motor is fine as I have 12V there. So I need a switch (either the one already there or another one wiring in as a temporary measure) connecting the supply wire that I know is good and one of the run terminals on the motor. That at least gets them going until I can figure out exactly which bit of wire is busted.
 
Last edited:
It's murder working on a car in this heat...

Not got the wipers going yet, need to go grab a 30A glass fuse from the store tomorrow. Ask me how I knew, without even checking it, that the fuse was blown. But I did get around to re-tuning the carb for an idle speed that lets the hydraulic pump get to work properly, and the engine is running sweet as owt :cool:
 
Because it's French?

Close! The brake light switch is on the same fuse.

But curiouser and curiouser. Looking at the wiring diagram, the input power that goes to Fuse 1 is then bridged off to supply Fuse 2 (which is wiper motor switch, brake light switch, wiper motor, screenwash pump and certain accessories like the interior B-pillar lights that come on when the doors are open). So how come, when I tested with a known good fuse in 2 tonight, do we have a nice solid 12V on the output from Fuse 1 and a wobbly sometimes-2V-sometimes-6V output that changes second by second from Fuse 2?

Weather stopped play earlier. But the order of play tomorrow will be to verify voltages in and out of fuses at key to off, accessory power, ignition on, and then with engine running. If Fuse 3, whose output is connected to nothing at all right now, has a solid 12V at all four positions then I'm simply going to use that as my supply voltage for the components currently on 2. And then lay good new wire all the way back to the switch on the steering column if I have to in order to get the wipers working properly. Got to have the dash panel bits off anyway to paint them, so taking them off will be good practice :)
 
30A for wipers, brake light switch, screenwash pump, interior light switches, cigarette lighter socket, dash clock. And yeah, it's a bit on the beefy side really. But the handbook reckons each of the four fuses is supposed to be 30A, so that's what it's having.

***edit***

The plot sort-of thickens. So the owners' handbook says all 4 fuses are 30A. The diagram for Oct '68 to Jan '69 (which the car could be, I haven't had time to check the VIN yet) makes no comment. The wiring diagram for post Jan '69 says 16A-10A-10A-10A. The car was definitely built before September '69 because the dashboard was a one-year design.

Screw it. My plan still stands - terminal 3 in the fusebox is getting and outputting 12V, so I'll just put an appropriate sized fuse in and work from there. All the way back to the switch if I have to.
 
Last edited:
Okay. So if I power Fuse 2 direct from battery with a temporary bodging wire I get wipers, screenwash, brake lights, interior lights :)

It's supposed to be powered by a line running from the starter relay terminal anyway, so I shall repeat the bodge but better. Just as soon as the weather isn't quite so torrential.

***edit***

I would have left the bodge in to be honest - it wasn't necessarily the peak of my hackery* with cars. But it did need weather-and-heat protection, and we were running out of useful time today so I pulled it back out.

* - now this on the other hand...this is the peak of my hackery, from when we were refitting the stock carb back on the Land Rover. It will forever remain something that I am unashamedly proud of :p

I said:
...witness the sheer level of hackery that pa and I descend into when refitting a stock Zenith carburettor and realising that the previous owner removed all of the linkage that goes from the accelerator pedal rods to the carb's throttle arm.

vrmZT2Z.jpg

Yes that is indeed a flat piece of steel galv-paint sprayed, with a u-bolt clamping it to the accelerator pedal bulkhead rod at one and and a bolt+balljoint at the other attaching it to the Zenith.
 
Last edited:
Right then. One rather better wire is now supplying power to Fuse 2, so we've got brake lights again :) La voiture is officially drivable once more.

Citroën weirdness, or maybe it's just me - that's an unswitched power supply, i.e. live without needing the key at all. Now yeah, there's stuff on that fuse that I'd expect to be permanently live (interior lights and clock to name two). But the brake light switch? The wipers?

God bless the French :D
 
I have a feeling you will be saying this a lot. Question is can it be any worse than the Bentley electrics :D Subbed !

Oh, it's already a thousand times easier to follow than the Bentley was, mainly because this car actually sticks to a sensible colouring scheme for the wiring :p The Bentley meanwhile wasn't even consistent side-to-side or front-to-back and had completely unlabelled relays with wires heading off deep into the car. Absolutely no way of telling what on Earth they were powering. You'd pull a relay out and nothing obvious would actually change! I never did find out what the one that was twittering behind the dashboard did. Don't suppose I ever will, which is a shame as boy did I lose some sleep and braincells over it...
 
Well, my dad has at least driven the car now. Reckons the brakes are an on-off switch (you get used to them, but they're very different) and quickly found out about the lack of synchromesh on 1st - I forgot to warn him about that, but then he daily drove the Landy with no synchro on the first two gears so he ought to cope alright. He hasn't mentioned the steering to me, which suggests that either the extra air I put in the front tyres has lightened the load some...or his shoulders are in good nick at the moment and he didn't find heavy steering an issue!
 
Theres no brake pedal is there, just a sort of button/dome on the floor.

The DSeseseseses got the button. The ID has a regular-style pedal but connected to (a slightly simpler version of) the high-pressure hydraulics. So you rest your foot on it and it's enough to make the car brake. Push slightly harder and you hear the pump getting ready to really slam the anchors on. And 2-3mm after that it's a bit like you ran into a brick wall :D

The Bentley brake pedal felt kinda similar, just a bit more mushy.
 
Ah, I've learned something. This whole time I thought that ID19 was just the code for the Citroen DS, I didn't realise that the ID19 was a lower spec model which was released later!

So there is a DS19 and an ID19. Interesting!

So it doesn't have the all-in-one suspension/braking/steering/clutching hydraulic system then?

Does it have the headlights which turn with the steering rack?

It has the suspension and the headlights. It doesn't have the semi-auto gearbox or the one-finger PAS.

So originally there was the DS19. The ID19 was introduced as a cheaper model below it after a couple of years. As engines gained in power and size those numbers went up - DS20, DS21, DS23. The IDs went to ID20 before the model was rebranded as the D Spécial and the D Super. Later there was a D Super 5 which had the DS21 engine and a 5 speed 'box.

Having test-driven a D Super 5 I'm not sure I particularly rate the later gearbox. Just seems like cramming the extra cog in didn't do a great deal for the quality of the gearshift compared with ours. And it's not as if it made the car much more long-legged.
 
Today's mildly surreal moment.

Rang a specialist parts place to enquire about some stuff that we need, the lady on the end asked for the reg number to see if the car was one that they knew of. She didn't recognise the plate, but as soon as I said about the car having been originally exported to Egypt she knew it straight away - she knows the guy who sold it to the previous owners ~25 years ago.

It's a small world, the classic car world smaller, the DS/ID world smaller still!
 
It was all going a bit too easily. Car now isn't starting - cranks, fuel seems to be getting up to the carb, but no start. And I'm looking at the coil wondering if I'm missing something, because it appears to be wired in backwards?

The ballast resistor is connected to the ignition switch one side, but from there is going to the negative post on the coil. I thought they went to positive? As far as I know it'll run with the coil wired backwards, just with a weaker spark than you'd otherwise get. And eventually the coil would take damage. I fired off a message to the seller asking if he knows when the coil was put in, but I think no matter what I'm going to have to accelerate plans to get this thing converted to electronic ignition.
 
Back
Top Bottom