because she went and told the boss that she knew somone had taken drugs, god knows why she did that though.
Your wife had a duty of care to report the incident to her mentor at the time she became aware of the event as the impact of the accusation could have directly impacted on the children in the care of that organisation. The mentors job is then to report that to the university and support the student through that. The student was also duty bound to report the incident to the university. The later is where the problem is. She should not have held on to the name that is negligent and is demonstrative of someone who does not grasp their responsibilities and professional accountability.
That there is a time interval here is understandable but it is also something that would not be deemed acceptable. That is why they are instigating such proceedings. Now I think under examination they will let your wife off and ask her to reflect on what she has learned from the incident. But at the end of the she had justifiable concerns and did not raise them immediately. That is something people look very dimly on. The university will be well aware the your wife will come out of her course with both and academic and a professional qualification. Unless you have done a course like that at university then it maybe hard to understand how that changes things from what normal students will expect.
She should be contact with her Student Union and contact the HCPC for advice. At the end of the day your wife is facing a very difficult time and I genuinely feel sorry for her as it is such a tricky situation. The lesson here is that in such jobs you have to absolutely keep to no chit chat at work and keep a very very strict line between work and everything else. The Student Union advise may be generic for students. However, students in faculties of Health and Social care are rightly held to different standards.
Your wife would be well advised to accept and recognise that she has done some 'wrong' and be willing to 'reflect' on that. That the other student took time to go is just a reflection of due process.
Exactly. Self kept to self, etc. But, as Xordium says, it was because of the position they were in and it was in the best interests of all around her - especially for working with kids - to report it.
Hearing of substance abuse isn't anything new on a uni campus.
Errr it's coke, while working with kids! It's not like it's a bit of weed, what the hell is wrong with some people here???
It's not the HCPC anymore for students it's the GSCC. HCPC don't register students anymore.
Your wife had a duty of care to report the incident to her mentor at the time she became aware of the event as the impact of the accusation could have directly impacted on the children in the care of that organisation. The mentors job is then to report that to the university and support the student through that. The student was also duty bound to report the incident to the university. The later is where the problem is. She should not have held on to the name that is negligent and is demonstrative of someone who does not grasp their responsibilities and professional accountability.
That there is a time interval here is understandable but it is also something that would not be deemed acceptable. That is why they are instigating such proceedings. Now I think under examination they will let your wife off and ask her to reflect on what she has learned from the incident. But at the end of the she had justifiable concerns and did not raise them immediately. That is something people look very dimly on. The university will be well aware the your wife will come out of her course with both and academic and a professional qualification. Unless you have done a course like that at university then it maybe hard to understand how that changes things from what normal students will expect.
She should be contact with her Student Union and contact the HCPC for advice. At the end of the day your wife is facing a very difficult time and I genuinely feel sorry for her as it is such a tricky situation. The lesson here is that in such jobs you have to absolutely keep to no chit chat at work and keep a very very strict line between work and everything else. The Student Union advise may be generic for students. However, students in faculties of Health and Social care are rightly held to different standards.
Your wife would be well advised to accept and recognise that she has done some 'wrong' and be willing to 'reflect' on that. That the other student took time to go is just a reflection of due process.
Thank you for your well thought out response.
At the moment my wife is not suspended the warnings came from one of the senior lecturers Yesterday. We have not had any communication regarding any investigation into my wife. I have read the code of conduct and associated policies and I will be meeting the student union rep with my wife but none of this will happen until after Tuesday. On Tuesday the student who took the drugs will be meeting with the Uni. Until we get some official response from Uni it is a waiting game. This week end I will be sitting down with the wife and going through what exactly what happened.
I thought the GSCC gave over the function to the HCPC and they passed it onto the universities on the proviso that students should be aware of their stipulations and broad practice guidelines?
Edit: Here: http://www.hpc-uk.org/education/studentsuitability/ Maybe be useful? Or is there something you know that would be more relevant for the OP?
Ok well that is very very different. You have had no official warning. You've got someone who has a bee in their bonnet and is likely not following due process themselves and is probably way off protocol./Snip.
Not sure on the exact details. The Mrs just did a hit and run on me. She is a newly qualified social worker.
She said something about students used to pay for HCPC but that ended a couple of years ago when it went to GSCC. Which kinda meant you didn't get the full backing of the HCPC.
However she also sympathised with the OP. She thinks that the op's wife did report it to a senior. She also recognised the effect that the other students actions may have so did her duty in reporting it.
It is an awkward situation as it does look like snitching. But thats our issue. If we looked out of our window and saw someone trying to nick the wheels of next doors car. Would it be snitching to ring the police.
I love that.
It's not like its a bit of weed
So a stoned social worker would be ok then.
Errr it's coke, while working with kids! It's not like it's a bit of weed, what the hell is wrong with some people here???