first fluent language is grunting, you live in a cave and shop at Lidl.
I still don't buy the comfort argument.
Comfort is dependent on your position, tyre pressure, road surface, saddle, chamois and many other factors. I think frame geometry is just marketing and you can have an aggressively set up "sportive" bike and a nodderfied, sit-up-and-beg Aeroad.
Please don't mention stiffness.
Even in a "pure hill climb" it's still aero trumps weight. People like Tejvan Pettinger (former national hill climb champ) would rather take the weight penalty and run a full carbon disc wheel.
I still don't buy the comfort argument.
Comfort is dependent on your position, tyre pressure, road surface, saddle, chamois and many other factors. I think frame geometry is just marketing and you can have an aggressively set up "sportive" bike and a nodderfied, sit-up-and-beg Aeroad.
Please don't mention stiffness.
Frame geometry is relevant to an extent, but only so far. Ultimately bike position is about the relative positions of your three contact points, which can be manipulated through saddles, seat posts, stems, bars, spacers...
Up to a limit. Good luck trying to get an aeroad setup like a sportive bike.
Up to a limit. Good luck trying to get an aeroad setup like a sportive bike.
Up to a limit. Good luck trying to get an aeroad setup like a sportive bike.
Out of interest, how many aero bikes were there in stage 15 of the Giro?
Positive 14 deg stem that is short on max spacers?
Spacers.
Posi degree stems.
Tassles on your handlebars.
A bell.
Tampons.
All at the same high level on the ponce scale.
Pro tip: remove the bar plugs on your bike and you can store tampons for mid ride menstrual emergencies.