AMD are outselling Intel 8-1.
He’s a strange one. The anti enthusiast.
Last edited by a moderator:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Alder Lake-S leaks
- Thread starter Grim5
- Start date
AMD are outselling Intel 8-1.
He’s a strange one. The anti enthusiast.
He won't answer you humbug.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 May 2015
- Posts
- 500
I will. It's not amazing because it doesn't take into account the work done i.e the actual fps. Every ADL chip released so far beats every Ryzan 5000 in perf/watt in gaming. They also beat the 5800X in productivity efficiency EXCEPT the 12900K on its stock settings.. which can be changed and then beats it soundly.
The *only* inefficient ADL scenario is a 12900K, on stock settings, with heavy multi-core workloads.
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 859
You telling fibs,I bought 8 AMD cpu's and 2 Intel CPU's in the last two years so it is 8-2 for AMD.Do not know where you get your facts 8-1 mind blown. do not tell dave
Humbug was quoting Dave2150. Are you Dave2150? If not then why are you replying to a post I made which was in response one Dave2150's posts?
LOL I bought a few hundred AMD chips and give about two dozen Intel ones away.
It’s like 320-0 currently.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 May 2015
- Posts
- 500
Lol, I'm sorry you didn't like the answer.
no difference
Suspended
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
In the tiny DIY segment, sure.
Caporegime
I know
Again its 14 Watts, the 5800X beat the 11900K by 70 Watts and was also faster in gaming, was that amazing?
The 5950X is 12% faster in Blender while using 135 Watts less than the 12900K Is that good? Its nuts, that's what it is.
People are being insanely selective with their parse here.
The 5800X uses 70 Watts less in games than the 11900K and you two can't get over the 14 watts 12900K vs 5950X.
70 Watts, nothing.
14 Watts, OMG that is amazing.
Last edited:
Maybe workstations and servers too.
They get a written warning for not posting hard enough
Last edited by a moderator:
Caporegime
They get a written warning for not posting hard enough
Its crazy how they go hyper over 14 Watts lower power for a CPU that's a bit faster in games, yet completely ignore a CPU that's also a bit faster in games and uses 70 watts less. Because its the wrong colour.
Some serious cognitive dissonance going on right before our eyes.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 May 2015
- Posts
- 500
The 11900K was a piece of crap. Or as Steve Burke likes to say, a total waste of sand.
Caporegime
And the 10900K along with it, by your measure.
so where is all Intel revenue coming from if AMD are beating them 8-2?
Intel Revenue 77b
AMD revenue 3.85b
are intel money laundering for the cartels or something?
AMD has 22.5% of the desktop market.
AMD had the highest market share way back in Q4 of 2006 at 25.3%.
Gaining marketshare for 20 years or something
I don't think AMD have ever been able to get the production capacity to be a true competitor, even if they have had the best CPU
Last edited:
It’s bizarre. Put me off buying an Alder lake chip to play with TBH.
Nice loading time boost in Civ 6, vs 5800X:
https://www.purepc.pl/test-procesor...wydajnosci-pamieci-ram-ddr4-vs-ddr5?page=0,14
https://www.purepc.pl/test-procesor...wydajnosci-pamieci-ram-ddr4-vs-ddr5?page=0,14
Intel make a lot more than CPU’s and have very low manufacturing costs, but they do sell a incredible amount of chips. It’s hard to understand the difference in size between Intel and pretty much all other company’s in the semiconductor industry. Intel are a behemoth with a huge business portfolio.
Last edited: