• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Alder Lake-S leaks

Leaked motherboard prices look high. New Intel Gigabyte Master about £150 more then the X570 equivalent?? I remember when x570 came out and Intel users were moaning at the prices of x570m if leaks are true i wonder what they will say then?
If i remember it correctly new platform has increased power requirements and that may have added to the cost.
 
Leaked motherboard prices look high. New Intel Gigabyte Master about £150 more then the X570 equivalent?? I remember when x570 came out and Intel users were moaning at the prices of x570m if leaks are true i wonder what they will say then?
The boards always start out higher when a new line are released. The B450 tomahawk was £100 yet the B550 tomahawk was like £180 but has dropped down now after milking the early adopters.
 
TBH, you can’t really blame the motherboard manufacturers for pumping the price a little. Intel motherboard sales have been in the toilet since the releases of AM4. The manufactures still have to support the Intel boards with minimal sales.
 
TBH, you can’t really blame the motherboard manufacturers for pumping the price a little. Intel motherboard sales have been in the toilet since the releases of AM4. The manufactures still have to support the Intel boards with minimal sales.
Don't blame the manufacturers at all, they charge what they charge and people pay what they pay. I just find it interesting that when the x570 Intel users laughed at the prices of boards but now roles are reversed and Intel users are using teh same excuses that AMD users where using
 
Don't blame the manufacturers at all, they charge what they charge and people pay what they pay. I just find it interesting that when the x570 Intel users laughed at the prices of boards but now roles are reversed and Intel users are using teh same excuses that AMD users where using

There is a lot BS on these forums. You have to filter them from the enthusiast posts and some with handfuls of salt.

I’m a motherboard and PSU snob. That really annoys a certain group of people on here. To be fair though, I’m looking for more from a motherboard than to just act a socket platform to best show the latest £1500 Nvidia card in its best light or hide it’s short comings.
 
Last edited:
I am just looking forward to see what PCI-E link between CPU and chipset is going to be implemented for that price.
 
I am just looking forward to see what PCI-E link between CPU and chipset is going to be implemented for that price.
This is all i could find
In addition to that, Intel Alder Lake CPUs will feature 16 PCIe Gen 5.0 (discrete graphics) and 4 PCIe Gen 4.0 lanes. The chipset will offer 12 Gen 4 and 16 Gen 3 lanes. As for the rest of the features for 600-series chipset motherboards, you can see them below:

  • eDP / 4DDI (DP, HDMI) Display Capabilities
  • 2-Channel (Up To DDR5-4800 / Up To DDR4-3200) Memory Support
  • x16 PCIe 5.0 / x4 PCIe 4.0 Lanes (CPU)
  • PCIe Express 4.0 & PCIe Express 3.0 Support (600-Series Chipset)
  • SATA 3.0
  • Integrated WiFi 6E
  • Discrete Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4 Compliant)
  • USB3 (20G) / USB3 (10G) / USB3 (5G) / USB 2.0
  • Intel LAN PHY
  • Intel Optane Memory H20 (H10 Successor)
 
Graphic cards don't need nor can utilise PCIe 5.0, but NVMe drives should be far sooner be able to use the bandwidth.

So if I was buying, I'd run the GPU at x16 PCIe 4.0 and use the x16 PCIe 5.0 slot for upto 4 NVMe drives. Assuming runnign the GPU off the chipset isn't a bottleneck.
 
Graphic cards don't need nor can utilise PCIe 5.0, but NVMe drives should be far sooner be able to use the bandwidth.

So if I was buying, I'd run the GPU at x16 PCIe 4.0 and use the x16 PCIe 5.0 slot for upto 4 NVMe drives. Assuming runnign the GPU off the chipset isn't a bottleneck.

4 Gen5 NVME drives are going to cost a fair chunk until we see mass adoption and the world has dealt with the chip shortage.

Mass adoption isn’t going to happen until EPYC uses PCI-E 5 and the silicon shortage isn’t going away until the pandemic ends.

Will any manufacturers even produce motherboards with 4x NVME gen 5 slots. I think it would be difficult to that type of design past product development.
 
Last edited:
Graphic cards don't need nor can utilise PCIe 5.0, but NVMe drives should be far sooner be able to use the bandwidth.

So if I was buying, I'd run the GPU at x16 PCIe 4.0 and use the x16 PCIe 5.0 slot for upto 4 NVMe drives. Assuming runnign the GPU off the chipset isn't a bottleneck.

Though I wouldn't mind I would doubt that we will see PCI_E 5.0 x16 any time soon.
 
Well I'm sure Gigabyte is also one of the companies that made record sales and profits selling GPU's comes at no surprise they now rack up the pricing on motherboards.

In before but muh PCI-E 5.0.
 
Back
Top Bottom