Apparently Jones' lawyers are very confident of winning all suits. Not exactly sure how they will argue it. A combination of the First Amendment and fine picking what he has said, for example he could have said, 'this looks dodgy, something doesn't look right, they look like child actors'. Different from saying, 'they are definitely child actors' etc. So possibly a long case after all dialogue is picked over.
As was posted in a previous video but me, because of the way YT is run, he doesn't actually have editorial responsibility for what he says and broadcasts as YT don't have this either. This is partly why YT have banned him because they are the ones who should really be getting sued here. Another case for him to argue. So overall he has many angles to fight with.
Best case scenario is a landmark ruling forcing YT to take full legal responsibility for all content on their site, essentially meaning it was would possibly have to close down as so much content would have to be removed. It's basically a wasteland anything goes lawless place of content atm and their judgement day is coming and they are not happy about it. Jones has possibly played a genius hand right from the beginning forcing the suits and ultimately forcing YT to change their policies and hence not dominate in favour of the democrats.
Why would parents sue anyway apart from financial gain. Really think about it what gain would they get by bankrupting Alex Jones other than money.
