[TW]Fox;18489723 said:As you are no doubt aware yes, I have covered several thousand miles in a 2011 Mustang ands several thousand miles in various E9x 3 Series. I'm not going to discuss the performance orientated specifics - ie handling and performance - but more the cars as a day to day tool. You know, the daily grind. The drive to the mall. The 150 miles back home, the sitting in traffic. That sort of thing.
It is here where there is a marked difference between the two. The M3 has a considerably better interior, is more luxurious, is made from better quality materials, is filled with a better standard of technical equipment - its just better as a day to day car. The Mustang is cheap and nasty in comparison - it feels like a far, far cheaper product.
I'm sure you will argue until the ends of the earth how on a track the Mustang comes close to the M3. I'm sure it does. But life involves more Walmart trips than it does trackdays.
For day to day use, the Mustang isn't even on the same page as the M3. I fully expected you to now rubbish my experience of the Mustang because I drove a 305bhp V6 not the V8 but there is absolutely NOTHING in the V8 that improves on the normal day to day experience. It has the same cabin...
Now in isolation the Mustang is a fantastic car. But it isnt in isolation here, it is being compared to an M3. The Mustang is half the price and in many areas this shows itself quite clearly. For the money, the Mustang is excellent. But the OP has the money for an M3, therefore he should purchase one and leave the Mustang to those who don't have the money for the M3.
That sort of logic would also imply that a Mustang and a Mercedes CL500 compete with each other! You kinda missed out the big important thing here - price.
Lets think of some other cars that compete using this unique weird logic.
How about the Toyota Camry and the Porsche Panamera? Both have 4 wheels. Both have a steering wheel. Both have V6 engines. Both have 4 doors and a boot. There we go chaps, the Camry - competition for the Porsche Panamera!
I am sorry but for me whether I am driving to the mall in a Mustang or an M3 I fail to see how it differs?
Both will get there in relative comfort, yes the BMW will have a better interior and more refinement, plus more toys if spec'd to do so.
Also the Mustang you drove was a V6 with the auto box which unless remapped kinda ruins the driving experience, the manual is so much better unless the AUTO is mapped to cure the factory issues.
It depends what Dave wants, if he wants the M3 for its DCT box then the Mustang has nothing that comes close, as the AUTO will never be as good as the DCT in the M3 when you in attack mode.
Just Dave mentioned saving money and having something he'd not have to worry about on campus, I'd have thought the BMW would be a worry, its a lot of value, it will depreciate heavily and cost quite a bit of money to run.
The Mustang offers very similar performance/handling and fun factor at the expense of interior quality and some refinement and I say some refinement because a Mustang cruises perfectly well. Difference is the Mustang is less likely to be touched, cost far less initially and is cheaper to run.
But as performance cars its my oppinion they are very alike and infact compete directly with each other, they are not marketed as such but when you look at the basics they are similar from a performance aspect.
